Clinical efficacy of novel self-adhesive flowable composite resin restoration: in vivo study
<p><strong>Objective:</strong> This study was carried out to evaluate the clinical performance of the conventional flowable composite resin restoration, using one- step adhesive system versus the novel self-adhesive flowable composite restoration.</p><p><strong>Me...
Saved in:
Main Authors: | , , , , |
---|---|
Format: | Book |
Published: |
International Journal of Oral and Craniofacial Science - Peertechz Publications,
2017-12-14.
|
Subjects: | |
Online Access: | Connect to this object online. |
Tags: |
Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
|
MARC
LEADER | 00000 am a22000003u 4500 | ||
---|---|---|---|
001 | peertech__10_17352_2455-4634_000033 | ||
042 | |a dc | ||
100 | 1 | 0 | |a Ghada A Elbaz |e author |
700 | 1 | 0 | |a Ola M Fahmy |e author |
700 | 1 | 0 | |a Mohamed Sherif M |e author |
700 | 1 | 0 | |a Farag |e author |
700 | 1 | 0 | |a Yousra S Helmy |e author |
245 | 0 | 0 | |a Clinical efficacy of novel self-adhesive flowable composite resin restoration: in vivo study |
260 | |b International Journal of Oral and Craniofacial Science - Peertechz Publications, |c 2017-12-14. | ||
520 | |a <p><strong>Objective:</strong> This study was carried out to evaluate the clinical performance of the conventional flowable composite resin restoration, using one- step adhesive system versus the novel self-adhesive flowable composite restoration.</p><p><strong>Method:</strong> Twenty patients received forty class I restorations in primary carious molars using split mouth design. Clinical performance was evaluated using US Public Health Service modified Ryge criteria. Restorations of both materials were evaluated for: anatomic form, marginal integrity, marginal discoloration, surface texture and recurrent caries after 1 week, 3, 6, 9 months and after 12 months.</p><p><strong>Results:</strong> Concerning the anatomic form, the marginal integrity and marginal discoloration, there was no statistical difference between both materials till 9 ms but at 12 ms, there was a significant difference in favor of the self-adhering flowable composite. As for the secondary caries till 6 ms, both materials scored 100% score 1, while, at 9 and 12 ms, there was no significant difference between both materials. The surface texture of both restorative materials scored (score1). Tracing both materials by time, there was a statistically significant difference in both materials in the anatomic form, marginal integrity and marginal discoloration.</p><p><strong>Conclusion:</strong> self-adhesive flowable composite showed improved clinical performance at 12 months than to conventional flowable composite.</p> | ||
540 | |a Copyright © Ghada A Elbaz et al. | ||
546 | |a en | ||
655 | 7 | |a Research Article |2 local | |
856 | 4 | 1 | |u https://doi.org/10.17352/2455-4634.000033 |z Connect to this object online. |