Determination of Composition and Palatability of Certain Weeds

<p>The aim of this study was to determine the chemical composition and palatability of certain commonly found weeds (Amaranthus retroflexus, Sorghum halepense, Cichorium intybus, Convolvulus arvensis and Lamium purpureum) in fodder crop areas. As a comparative characteristic of weeds was used...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Atanas Kirilov (Author), Natalia Georgieva (Author), Ina Stoycheva (Author)
Format: Book
Published: International Journal of Agricultural Science and Food Technology - Peertechz Publications, 2016-12-30.
Subjects:
Online Access:Connect to this object online.
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!

MARC

LEADER 00000 am a22000003u 4500
001 peertech__10_17352_2455-815X_000013
042 |a dc 
100 1 0 |a Atanas Kirilov  |e author 
700 1 0 |a  Natalia Georgieva  |e author 
700 1 0 |a Ina Stoycheva  |e author 
245 0 0 |a Determination of Composition and Palatability of Certain Weeds 
260 |b International Journal of Agricultural Science and Food Technology - Peertechz Publications,   |c 2016-12-30. 
520 |a <p>The aim of this study was to determine the chemical composition and palatability of certain commonly found weeds (Amaranthus retroflexus, Sorghum halepense, Cichorium intybus, Convolvulus arvensis and Lamium purpureum) in fodder crop areas. As a comparative characteristic of weeds was used alfalfa. Palatability is one of the indicators of fodder quality and it is related to the feed consumption and nutritional value. It was determined through so-called method "cafeteria of manger". The results showed that C. arvensis and A. retroflexus had higher protein content and lower fi ber content of the hay compared to the other weeds with the highest palatability among weeds was C. arvensis (33.89%). This value was close to the palatability of alfalfa hay (38.89%). The second place was occupied by A. retroflexus (16.52%). The remaining weeds (S. halepense, C. intybus, L. purpureum) had considerably lower palatability. The method "cafeteria of manger" is easy to be performed and provides another opportunity to compare different forages.</p> 
540 |a Copyright © Atanas Kirilov et al. 
546 |a en 
655 7 |a Research Article  |2 local 
856 4 1 |u https://doi.org/10.17352/2455-815X.000013  |z Connect to this object online.