Comparison of complication and success rates of perclose proglide device with surgical cut down in patients undergoing TAVI and TEVAR/EVAR Procedures
<p>Background: The Common Femoral Artery (CFA) is the most frequently used peripheral artery for Trans-catheter aortic valve implantation (TAVI) and Endovascular Aortic Repair (EVAR)/ Thoracic Endovascular Aortic Repair (TEVAR) procedures. CFA access hemostasis could be obtained by manual comp...
Saved in:
Main Authors: | , , , , , , , |
---|---|
Format: | Book |
Published: |
Annals of Circulation - Peertechz Publications,
2022-12-31.
|
Subjects: | |
Online Access: | Connect to this object online. |
Tags: |
Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
|
MARC
LEADER | 00000 am a22000003u 4500 | ||
---|---|---|---|
001 | peertech__10_17352_ac_000019 | ||
042 | |a dc | ||
100 | 1 | 0 | |a Jamal Moosavi |e author |
700 | 1 | 0 | |a Somaye Ahmadi |e author |
700 | 1 | 0 | |a Parham Sadeghipour |e author |
700 | 1 | 0 | |a Ata Firoozi |e author |
700 | 1 | 0 | |a Bahram Mohebbi |e author |
700 | 1 | 0 | |a Omid Shafe |e author |
700 | 1 | 0 | |a Hooman Bakhshandeh Abkenar |e author |
700 | 1 | 0 | |a Ahoura Salehi Nobandegani |e author |
245 | 0 | 0 | |a Comparison of complication and success rates of perclose proglide device with surgical cut down in patients undergoing TAVI and TEVAR/EVAR Procedures |
260 | |b Annals of Circulation - Peertechz Publications, |c 2022-12-31. | ||
520 | |a <p>Background: The Common Femoral Artery (CFA) is the most frequently used peripheral artery for Trans-catheter aortic valve implantation (TAVI) and Endovascular Aortic Repair (EVAR)/ Thoracic Endovascular Aortic Repair (TEVAR) procedures. CFA access hemostasis could be obtained by manual compression, surgical cut-down, or using arteriotomy closure devices, including ProGlide.</p><p>Method: During a retrospective cohort study we compared ProGlide with surgical cut-down hemostasis in 225 patients who underwent TAVI or EVAR/TEVAR, including 290 access sites, during a 10 years period in terms of access site complications, procedure length and post-procedural hospitalization duration.</p><p>Results: The success rate of hemostasis was 100% in the PP device group and 98.3% in the SCD group. The mean Procedure length was significantly shorter in ProGlide device hemostasis and the mean post-procedural hospitalization length had a non-significant difference between the two groups. Access site complications occurred in 21.1% of the ProGlide group and 26% of the SCD group. </p><p>Conclusion: Perclose ProGlide device is safe and effective for access site closure in procedures that need large sheaths and it is non-inferior to standard surgical cut-down. Training, experience and careful application of the device have significant importance in ensuring successful hemostasis.</p> | ||
540 | |a Copyright © Jamal Moosavi et al. | ||
546 | |a en | ||
655 | 7 | |a Case Report |2 local | |
856 | 4 | 1 | |u https://doi.org/10.17352/ac.000019 |z Connect to this object online. |