Physical contradictions ruling out photonic quantum nonlocality
<p>A series of physical contradictions can be identified in an opinion article published in December 2015 (A. Aspect, "Closing the Door on Einstein and Bohr's Quantum Debate," Physics 8, 123, 2015) claiming definitive proof of quantum nonlocality based on entangled pairs of phot...
Sábháilte in:
Príomhchruthaitheoir: | |
---|---|
Formáid: | LEABHAR |
Foilsithe / Cruthaithe: |
Annals of Mathematics and Physics - Peertechz Publications,
2022-10-29.
|
Ábhair: | |
Rochtain ar líne: | Connect to this object online. |
Clibeanna: |
Cuir clib leis
Níl clibeanna ann, Bí ar an gcéad duine le clib a chur leis an taifead seo!
|
MARC
LEADER | 00000 am a22000003u 4500 | ||
---|---|---|---|
001 | peertech__10_17352_amp_000057 | ||
042 | |a dc | ||
100 | 1 | 0 | |a Andre Vatarescu |e author |
245 | 0 | 0 | |a Physical contradictions ruling out photonic quantum nonlocality |
260 | |b Annals of Mathematics and Physics - Peertechz Publications, |c 2022-10-29. | ||
520 | |a <p>A series of physical contradictions can be identified in an opinion article published in December 2015 (A. Aspect, "Closing the Door on Einstein and Bohr's Quantum Debate," Physics 8, 123, 2015) claiming definitive proof of quantum nonlocality based on entangled pairs of photons. For example, experimental results published simultaneously in Physical Review Letters (250401 and 250402, 2015) were theoretically fitted with distributions containing a dominant unentangled component, contradicting the need for maximally entangled states underpinning quantum nonlocality. Such contradictions were ignored by the 2022 Nobel Prize Committee raising doubts about the validity of their decision.</p> | ||
540 | |a Copyright © Andre Vatarescu et al. | ||
546 | |a en | ||
655 | 7 | |a Mini Review |2 local | |
856 | 4 | 1 | |u https://doi.org/10.17352/amp.000057 |z Connect to this object online. |