Criteria for radiological evaluation of incorporation of stand-alone expandable cervical vertebral body replacement devices

<p>Introduction: Corpectomy is an important treatment option for various cervical pathologies and evaluation of treatment success on imaging can be even more difficult than for interbody fusion. Since for routine postoperative courses CT scanning seems not justified for evaluation of the fusio...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Hassan Allouch (Author), Sándor Kónya (Author), Mootaz Shousha (Author), Heinrich Boehm (Author)
Format: Book
Published: International Journal of Spine Research - Peertechz Publications, 2020-07-06.
Subjects:
Online Access:Connect to this object online.
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!

MARC

LEADER 00000 am a22000003u 4500
001 peertech__10_17352_ijsr_000013
042 |a dc 
100 1 0 |a Hassan Allouch  |e author 
700 1 0 |a  Sándor Kónya  |e author 
700 1 0 |a  Mootaz Shousha  |e author 
700 1 0 |a Heinrich Boehm  |e author 
245 0 0 |a Criteria for radiological evaluation of incorporation of stand-alone expandable cervical vertebral body replacement devices 
260 |b International Journal of Spine Research - Peertechz Publications,   |c 2020-07-06. 
520 |a <p>Introduction: Corpectomy is an important treatment option for various cervical pathologies and evaluation of treatment success on imaging can be even more difficult than for interbody fusion. Since for routine postoperative courses CT scanning seems not justified for evaluation of the fusion status this paper proposes markers for detailed evaluation of new on plain radiographs. </p><p>Methods: In a retrospective analysis of prospectively collected consecutive patients were included from whom a minimum 2 year clinical and radiological follow-up was available of stand-alone VBR after cervical corpectomy for degenerative stenosis. All patients received an expandable cage of rectangular shape. For assessment of bony incorporation of VBR devices we introduce the footprint sign in addition to McAfee´s sentinel sign. Three observers evaluated the lateral x-rays of the patients. </p><p>Results: 36 male and 33 female patients (mean age 61,9 years) underwent one-, two- or three-level anterior cervical corpectomy and fusion (29, 31 and 9 patients respectively). Radiological outcome was assessed at a mean follow-up of 44.5 months. Combined cranial and caudal footprint sign denoting fusion could be detected in 94% of the cases. A positive sentinel sign anterior or posterior was denoting fusion in 47 out of 68 evaluable cases. Four cases (5.9%) showed no sufficient anterior or posterior bridging after 2 years and were rated as pseudoarthrosis. </p><p>Conclusion: For routine patients with no or minor symptoms after cervical VBR the sentinel- and footprint-sign on standard x-rays is a good indicator of successful treatment. Once reached no additional (flex-ex or CT) diagnostics seems necessary.</p> 
540 |a Copyright © Hassan Allouch et al. 
546 |a en 
655 7 |a Research Article  |2 local 
856 4 1 |u https://doi.org/10.17352/ijsr.000013  |z Connect to this object online.