Copertina

Use of Vaginal Misoprostol Prior to Placement of an Intrauterine Device: A Review

<p>Intrauterine devices (IUD) are a highly effective and safe form of contraception. However, many individuals, particularly nulligravidas, elect against IUD use due to fear of pain associated with insertion. Misoprostol has been proposed as an agent to ease IUD insertion and decrease associat...

Descrizione completa

Salvato in:

Dettagli Bibliografici
Autori principali:	Elizabeth Hoover (Autore), Abbey Hardy- Fairbanks (Autore), Colleen K Stockdale (Autore)
Natura:	Libro
Pubblicazione:	Journal of Gynecological Research and Obstetrics - Peertechz Publications, 2017-04-13.
Soggetti:	Review Article
Accesso online:	Connect to this object online.
Tags:	Aggiungi Tag Nessun Tag, puoi essere il primo ad aggiungerne!!

Documenti analoghi

Perception about Intrauterine Devices, Prior to and After Placement-Prospective Survey
di: Andreia de Vasconcelos Gaspar, et al.
Pubblicazione: (2022)

Potency and acceptability of oral misoprostol compared with vaginal misoprostol prior to first trimester abortion
di: Varsha Kotwal
Pubblicazione: (2020)

Postpartum intrauterine device placement: a patient-friendly option
di: Carrie Cwiak, et al.
Pubblicazione: (2018)

Comparison of mifepristone combination with misoprostol and misoprostol alone in the management of intrauterine death
di: Damyanti Sharma, et al.
Pubblicazione: (2011)

Postplacental Placement of Intrauterine Devices: Acceptability, Reasons for Refusal and Proposals to Increase its Use
di: Maria Beatriz de Paula Leite Kraft, et al.
Pubblicazione: (2021)

The use of misoprostol for cervical priming prior to hysteroscopy: a systematic review and analysis
di: Hua Y, et al.
Pubblicazione: (2016)

Vaginal health in copper intrauterine device users and non-users
di: Thonnaphat Teeraganok, et al.
Pubblicazione: (2012)

Comparison of the effect of vaginal misoprostol and evening primrose oil capsule with misoprostol alone on the consequences of abortion in women with intrauterine fetal death: a randomized clinical trial
di: Hadis Hashemi, et al.
Pubblicazione: (2023)

Misoprostol vaginal insert versus misoprostol vaginal tablets for the induction of labour: a cohort study
di: Daniele Bolla, et al.
Pubblicazione: (2018)

Novel Concepts for Intrauterine Device Placement at Caesarean Delivery: Description of Technique and Video Recording
di: G. Justus Hofmeyr, et al.
Pubblicazione: (2023)

Misoprostol sublingual versus vaginal para indução do parto Sublingual versus vaginal misoprostol for induction of labor
di: Francisco Edson de Lucena Feitosa
Pubblicazione: (2006)

Misoprostol sublingual versus vaginal para indução do parto Sublingual versus vaginal misoprostol for induction of labor
di: Francisco Edson de Lucena Feitosa
Pubblicazione: (2006)

Vaginal Misoprostol in Early Pregnancy Failure
di: Suguna R.Kumar, et al.
Pubblicazione: (2010)

Ex-vivo forces associated with intrauterine device placement and perforation: a biomechanical evaluation of hysterectomy specimens
di: Jane Duncan, et al.
Pubblicazione: (2021)

Ultrasound assessment of postplacental copper intrauterine device position 6 months after placement during cesarean delivery
di: Elizabeth P. Gurney, et al.
Pubblicazione: (2020)

Uptake of postplacental intrauterine device placement at cesarean deliveryAJOG Global Reports at a Glance
di: Heather E. Sweeney, MD, et al.
Pubblicazione: (2023)

Comparing usefulness of immediate postpartum intrauterine contraceptive device among the women undergoing caesarean or vaginal insertion
di: Nirja Sharma
Pubblicazione: (2022)

A comparison of misoprostol vaginal insert and misoprostol vaginal tablets for induction of labor in nulliparous women: a retrospective cohort study
di: Kjersti Engen Marsdal, et al.
Pubblicazione: (2018)

Concomitant Serratia marcescens Peritonitis and Tubo-ovarian Abscess Associated with Peritoneal Dialysis and Intrauterine Device Placement
di: Yu-Wei Chen, et al.
Pubblicazione: (2007)

COMPLICATIONS OF INTRAUTERINE DEVICE (I.U.D) AND ITS' IMPACTS ON BREAST FEEDING PERIOD AT THE TIME OF PLACEMENT
di: Ghorbani, S, et al.
Pubblicazione: (2002)

Comparison of Vaginal Trinitroglycerin (TNG) and Vaginal Misoprostol in Cervical Ripening at term pregnancy
di: Batoul Teimouri, et al.
Pubblicazione: (2018)

Misoprostol sublingual versus vaginal para indução do parto a termo Sublingual versus vaginal misoprostol for labor induction of term pregnancies
di: Olímpio Barbosa de Moraes Filho, et al.
Pubblicazione: (2005)

Foley Catheter versus Vaginal Misoprostol for Labour Induction
di: Nasreen Noor, et al.
Pubblicazione: (2015)

Intrauterine device quo vadis? Why intrauterine device use should be revisited particularly in nulliparous women?
di: Wildemeersch D, et al.
Pubblicazione: (2015)

Role of Combination OF Mifepristone and Misoprostol Verses Misoprostol alone in Induction of Labour in Late Intrauterin Fetal Death: A Prospective Study.
di: Subrat Panda, et al.
Pubblicazione: (2013)

Pharmacokinetics of vaginal versus buccal misoprostol for labor induction at term
di: Yana Vorontsova, et al.
Pubblicazione: (2022)

Intrauterine Misoprostol plus Intravenous Oxytocin for Reduction of Blood Loss in Cesarean Delivery
di: Wirawan Rasri
Pubblicazione: (2018)

Pretreatment with Misoprostol Reduces Intrauterine Adhesions After Surgical Termination of Missed Abortion
di: Sedat Akgöl, et al.
Pubblicazione: (2012)

Effect of extra-amniotic Foley's catheter and vaginal misoprostol versus vaginal misoprostol alone on cervical ripening and induction of labor in Kenya, a randomized controlled trial
di: Alfred Osoti, et al.
Pubblicazione: (2018)

Comparison of sublingual and vaginal misoprostol for second-trimester pregnancy terminations.
di: Forozan Milani, et al.
Pubblicazione: (2014)

Decoronation as an option for ridge preservation prior to implant placement
di: Dragović Miroslav, et al.
Pubblicazione: (2017)

Intravaginal isonicotinic acid hydrazide (INH) versus misoprostol for cervical ripening prior to hysteroscopy
di: Ladan Haghighi, et al.
Pubblicazione: (2020)

Intrauterine device and cervical cancer
di: Brahmana Askandar Tjokroprawiro
Pubblicazione: (2020)

INTRAUTERINE DEVICES (IUDS) BENEFITS
di: Z. Shahvari
Pubblicazione: (2005)

New developments in intrauterine device use: focus on the US
di: Nelson AL, et al.
Pubblicazione: (2016)

Oral versus Vaginal Misoprostol for Labour Induction : A Comparative Study
di: Eke P Mahacakri, et al.
Pubblicazione: (2018)

Comparison of sequential vaginal and sublingual misoprostol after a vaginal loading dose for second-trimester abortion
di: Ming-Chao Huang, et al.
Pubblicazione: (2017)

Anaphylactic shock to vaginal misoprostol: a rare adverse reaction to a frequently used drug
di: Hyun Joo Shin, et al.
Pubblicazione: (2018)

Trends in use of and complications from intrauterine contraceptive devices and tubal ligation or occlusion
di: Brandon Howard, et al.
Pubblicazione: (2017)

Immediate Postpartum Intrauterine Contraceptive Device Insertions in Caesarean and Vaginal Deliveries: A Comparative Study of Follow-Up Outcomes
di: Reetu Hooda, et al.
Pubblicazione: (2016)