The lecturer's evaluation form : a critical response by students and lecturers / Julina Munchar ... [et al.]

This study investigates the effectiveness of using the Lecturer's Evaluation Form (LEF) to evaluate lecturers at the Academy of Language Studies (APB) in Universiti Teknologi MARA (UiTM). Questionnaires were given out to students from various faculties in UiTM as well as lecturers teaching in A...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Munchar, Julina (Author), Ang, Paul Ban Hock (Author), Choy, Tuck Onn (Author), Fung, Anna (Author)
Format: Book
Published: Academy of Language Studies & UPENA, 2005.
Subjects:
Online Access:Link Metadata
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!

MARC

LEADER 00000 am a22000003u 4500
001 repouitm_11450
042 |a dc 
100 1 0 |a Munchar, Julina  |e author 
700 1 0 |a Ang, Paul Ban Hock  |e author 
700 1 0 |a Choy, Tuck Onn  |e author 
700 1 0 |a Fung, Anna  |e author 
245 0 0 |a The lecturer's evaluation form : a critical response by students and lecturers / Julina Munchar ... [et al.] 
260 |b Academy of Language Studies & UPENA,   |c 2005. 
500 |a https://ir.uitm.edu.my/id/eprint/11450/1/AJ_JULINA%20MUNCHAR%20JOLS%2005.pdf 
520 |a This study investigates the effectiveness of using the Lecturer's Evaluation Form (LEF) to evaluate lecturers at the Academy of Language Studies (APB) in Universiti Teknologi MARA (UiTM). Questionnaires were given out to students from various faculties in UiTM as well as lecturers teaching in APB, UiTM. The questions were constructed to elicit responses to students' ability in evaluating their lecturers fairly, the effectiveness of the LEF as well as the appropriateness of the criteria stated in the LEF. In general, the lecturers and the students were of the opinion that the students were capable of evaluating the lecturers fairly and that the LEF was an appropriate means of appraising lecturers. However, some suggestions were made on modifying the LEF. The respondents suggested that for the LEF to serve as a useful instrument in determining the lecturer's performance, it needed to be modified and its manner of administration reworked. 
546 |a en 
690 |a Malaysia 
690 |a Student evaluation of teachers. Rating. Including academic success and failure 
690 |a Universiti Teknologi MARA 
655 7 |a Article  |2 local 
655 7 |a PeerReviewed  |2 local 
787 0 |n https://ir.uitm.edu.my/id/eprint/11450/ 
856 4 1 |u https://ir.uitm.edu.my/id/eprint/11450/  |z Link Metadata