Focus group interview as a means to determine school effectiveness indicators / Sueb Ibrahim ... [et al.]
The growth of interest in school effectiveness has been striking and is gaining momentum. Similarly in Malaysia, school effectiveness has become a dominant theme in contemporary educational reform and development. Thus, the growing concern about educational reform has resulted in a wide variety of s...
Saved in:
Main Authors: | , , , |
---|---|
Format: | Book |
Published: |
Universiti Teknologi MARA Cawangan Sarawak,
2018-09.
|
Subjects: | |
Online Access: | Link Metadata |
Tags: |
Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
|
MARC
LEADER | 00000 am a22000003u 4500 | ||
---|---|---|---|
001 | repouitm_33440 | ||
042 | |a dc | ||
100 | 1 | 0 | |a Ibrahim, Sueb |e author |
700 | 1 | 0 | |a Aperapar Singh, Parmjit Singh |e author |
700 | 1 | 0 | |a Choo, Ng Kui |e author |
700 | 1 | 0 | |a Boje, Ramilah |e author |
245 | 0 | 0 | |a Focus group interview as a means to determine school effectiveness indicators / Sueb Ibrahim ... [et al.] |
260 | |b Universiti Teknologi MARA Cawangan Sarawak, |c 2018-09. | ||
500 | |a https://ir.uitm.edu.my/id/eprint/33440/1/33440.pdf | ||
520 | |a The growth of interest in school effectiveness has been striking and is gaining momentum. Similarly in Malaysia, school effectiveness has become a dominant theme in contemporary educational reform and development. Thus, the growing concern about educational reform has resulted in a wide variety of school effectiveness interventions, initiatives and strategies. Although school effectiveness has become the central focus in most schools, there is still a strong need to determine the constructs or dimensions that are suitable to measure school effectiveness in Malaysian secondary schools. In this study, a focus group interview consisting of eight selected excellent and senior school principals were conducted. The findings from the focus group interview indicated 5 indicators for school effectiveness which comprised academic performance, school programme, organizational effectiveness, learning environment and school achievement. The findings also indicated 15sub-indicators for school effectiveness consisting of curriculum, public exam, student assessment, academic programme, co-curriculum programme, student development, resource management, technology advancement, data and information management, teaching and learning, community relation, staff professional development,, award and recognition, innovation and niche area | ||
546 | |a en | ||
690 | |a Academies and learned societies (General) | ||
690 | |a Study and teaching. Research | ||
690 | |a Teaching (Principles and practice) | ||
690 | |a Learning. Learning strategies | ||
655 | 7 | |a Article |2 local | |
655 | 7 | |a PeerReviewed |2 local | |
787 | 0 | |n https://ir.uitm.edu.my/id/eprint/33440/ | |
787 | 0 | |n http://www.ijsmssarawak.com/ | |
856 | 4 | 1 | |u https://ir.uitm.edu.my/id/eprint/33440/ |z Link Metadata |