Implementation of machine learning for predicting maize crop yields using multiple linear regression and backward elimination / Stephen Gbenga Fashoto ... [et al.]

Predicting maize crop yields especially in maize production is paramount in order to alleviate poverty and contribute towards food security. Many regions experience food shortage especially in Africa because of uncertain climatic changes, poor irrigation facilities, reduction in soil fertility and t...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Fashoto, Stephen Gbenga (Author), Mbunge, Elliot (Author), Ogunleye, Gabriel (Author), den Burg, Johan Van (Author)
Format: Book
Published: Universiti Teknologi MARA, 2021-04.
Subjects:
Online Access:Link Metadata
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!

MARC

LEADER 00000 am a22000003u 4500
001 repouitm_47823
042 |a dc 
100 1 0 |a Fashoto, Stephen Gbenga  |e author 
700 1 0 |a Mbunge, Elliot  |e author 
700 1 0 |a Ogunleye, Gabriel  |e author 
700 1 0 |a den Burg, Johan Van  |e author 
245 0 0 |a Implementation of machine learning for predicting maize crop yields using multiple linear regression and backward elimination / Stephen Gbenga Fashoto ... [et al.] 
260 |b Universiti Teknologi MARA,   |c 2021-04. 
500 |a https://ir.uitm.edu.my/id/eprint/47823/1/47823.pdf 
520 |a Predicting maize crop yields especially in maize production is paramount in order to alleviate poverty and contribute towards food security. Many regions experience food shortage especially in Africa because of uncertain climatic changes, poor irrigation facilities, reduction in soil fertility and traditional farming techniques. Therefore, predicting maize crop yields helps policymakers to make timely import and export decisions to strengthen national food security. However, none of the published work has been done to predict maize crop yields using machine learning in Eswatini, Africa. This paper aimed at applying machine learning (ML) to predict maize yields for a single season in Eswatini. A ML model was trained and tested using open-source data and local data. This is done by using three different data splits with the opensource predictor data consisting of 48 data points each with 7 attributes and open-source response data consisting of 48 data points each with a single attribute, adjusted R² values were 0.784 (at 70:30), 0.849 (at 80:20), and 0.878 (at 90:10) before being normalized, 1.00 across the board after normalization, and 0.846 (at 70:30), 0.886 (at 80:20), and 0.885 (at 90:10) after backward elimination. At the second attempt, it is done by using the combined predictor data of 68 data points with 7 attributes each and combined response data of 68 data points with a single attribute each, with the same data splits and methods adjusted R² values were 0.966 (at 70:30), 0.972 (at 80:20), and 0.978 (at 90:10) before being normalized, 1.00 across the board after normalization, and 0.967 (at 70:30), 0.973 (at 80:20), and 0.978 (at 90:10) after backward elimination. 
546 |a en 
690 |a Multivariate analysis. Cluster analysis. Longitudinal method 
690 |a Analytic mechanics 
655 7 |a Article  |2 local 
655 7 |a PeerReviewed  |2 local 
787 0 |n https://ir.uitm.edu.my/id/eprint/47823/ 
787 0 |n https://mjoc.uitm.edu.my 
856 4 1 |u https://ir.uitm.edu.my/id/eprint/47823/  |z Link Metadata