Nanoindentation system for material properties identification / Teo Adrian Wei Hong, Yeap Gik Hong and Loo Wei Jie

This paper proposed to design a nanoindentation system with the intention to identify material properties without spalling. The system is designed to perform simulation based on the load-depth curve data collected from NanoTestTM. The hardness results are compared with Brinell hardness test and Nano...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Teo, Adrian Wei Hong (Author), Yeap, Gik Hong (Author), Loo, Wei Jie (Author)
Format: Book
Published: UiTM Press, 2015-12.
Subjects:
Online Access:Link Metadata
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!

MARC

LEADER 00000 am a22000003u 4500
001 repouitm_62980
042 |a dc 
100 1 0 |a Teo, Adrian Wei Hong  |e author 
700 1 0 |a Yeap, Gik Hong  |e author 
700 1 0 |a Loo, Wei Jie  |e author 
245 0 0 |a Nanoindentation system for material properties identification / Teo Adrian Wei Hong, Yeap Gik Hong and Loo Wei Jie 
260 |b UiTM Press,   |c 2015-12. 
500 |a https://ir.uitm.edu.my/id/eprint/62980/1/62980.pdf 
520 |a This paper proposed to design a nanoindentation system with the intention to identify material properties without spalling. The system is designed to perform simulation based on the load-depth curve data collected from NanoTestTM. The hardness results are compared with Brinell hardness test and NanoTestTM for the same materials; i.e. brass, mild steel, aluminium and copper. Oliver-Pharr and Joslin-Oliver methods are selected to measure the material properties. Both selected methods require indentation load, impression area and depth to fulfil the material properties calculation while these signals are collected through a displacement sensor and an actuator. The results collected indicate that the spall of material rate, which can be reduced by decreasing the indentation load while maintaining the indentation depth at a longer dwell time. The theoretical simulation result of Joslin-Oliver method which neglects substrate effect acquired an average error rate of 7.823% whereas Oliver-Pharr method acquired an average error rate of 6.355%, both with comparison against NanoTestTM machine. The experiments have been performed using same materials; i.e. brass, aluminium, copper and mild steel. 
546 |a en 
690 |a TJ Mechanical engineering and machinery 
655 7 |a Article  |2 local 
655 7 |a PeerReviewed  |2 local 
787 0 |n https://ir.uitm.edu.my/id/eprint/62980/ 
787 0 |n https://jeesr.uitm.edu.my/v1/ 
856 4 1 |u https://ir.uitm.edu.my/id/eprint/62980/  |z Link Metadata