The social construction of risk: evidence from UK banks / Dominic Roberts and Ekililu Salifu

This research presents empirical evidence of the perceptions of risk in UK operating banks and how these perceptions influence risk processes at these institutions. We used social constructivism to understand the views of UK managers in the banking industry. The study found that there was a divide i...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Roberts, Dominic (Author), Salifu, Ekililu (Author)
Format: Book
Published: Accounting Research Institute (ARI) and UiTM Press, Universiti Teknologi MARA, 2023-08.
Subjects:
Online Access:Link Metadata
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!

MARC

LEADER 00000 am a22000003u 4500
001 repouitm_83426
042 |a dc 
100 1 0 |a Roberts, Dominic  |e author 
700 1 0 |a Salifu, Ekililu  |e author 
245 0 0 |a The social construction of risk: evidence from UK banks / Dominic Roberts and Ekililu Salifu 
260 |b Accounting Research Institute (ARI) and UiTM Press, Universiti Teknologi MARA,   |c 2023-08. 
500 |a https://ir.uitm.edu.my/id/eprint/83426/1/83426.pdf 
520 |a This research presents empirical evidence of the perceptions of risk in UK operating banks and how these perceptions influence risk processes at these institutions. We used social constructivism to understand the views of UK managers in the banking industry. The study found that there was a divide in risk perception among risk managers in UK operating banks. Such a divide is crucial in explaining the differences in risk approach and risk processes in the banking industry. The discussion presented is based on the results of 25 semi-structured interviews. Two distinct characterizations of risk emerged from the data. One perceived risk as a calculable, measurable construct that can be managed, controlled and verified. The other conceived risk as a mixture of mathematical numerics and social ideals that engages an understanding of and appreciation for the concept. Each viewpoint represents an opportunity to fathom risk in its own context, contributing to the critical debate on risk management. The extent to which social factors influence risk decisions varied among banking institutions. 
546 |a en 
690 |a Entrepreneurship. Risk and uncertainty 
690 |a Banks and the state. State supervision of banks 
655 7 |a Article  |2 local 
655 7 |a PeerReviewed  |2 local 
787 0 |n https://ir.uitm.edu.my/id/eprint/83426/ 
787 0 |n https://apmaj.uitm.edu.my/ 
856 4 1 |u https://ir.uitm.edu.my/id/eprint/83426/  |z Link Metadata