An Analysis Of Speech Errors In A Talk Show Program Of Metro TV Face To Face With Desi Anwar Broadcasted In January To June 2012

This thesis is written to achieve four objectives that is to identify the types of speech errors, to tabulate the frequency of each type of speech error and the dominant of speech error, and to elaborate the sources of speech errors in the talk show program of Metro TV Face to Face with Desi Anwar b...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Wijayanti, Farida Indri (Author), , Prof. Dr. Endang Fauziati, M.Hum (Author), , Prof. M. Anam Sutopo, M.Hum (Author)
Format: Book
Published: 2013.
Subjects:
Online Access:Connect to this object online
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!

MARC

LEADER 00000 am a22000003u 4500
001 repoums_26519
042 |a dc 
100 1 0 |a Wijayanti, Farida Indri  |e author 
700 1 0 |a , Prof. Dr. Endang Fauziati, M.Hum  |e author 
700 1 0 |a , Prof. M. Anam Sutopo, M.Hum  |e author 
245 0 0 |a An Analysis Of Speech Errors In A Talk Show Program Of Metro TV Face To Face With Desi Anwar Broadcasted In January To June 2012 
260 |c 2013. 
500 |a https://eprints.ums.ac.id/26519/9/9RR._NASKAH_PUBLIKASI.pdf 
500 |a https://eprints.ums.ac.id/26519/1/2._HALAMAN_DEPAN.pdf 
500 |a https://eprints.ums.ac.id/26519/2/3._BAB_1.pdf 
500 |a https://eprints.ums.ac.id/26519/3/4._BAB_2.pdf 
500 |a https://eprints.ums.ac.id/26519/4/5._BAB_3.pdf 
500 |a https://eprints.ums.ac.id/26519/5/6._BAB_4.pdf 
500 |a https://eprints.ums.ac.id/26519/6/7._BAB_5.pdf 
500 |a https://eprints.ums.ac.id/26519/7/8._BIBIOGRAPHY.pdf 
500 |a https://eprints.ums.ac.id/26519/8/9._APPENDIX_.pdf 
520 |a This thesis is written to achieve four objectives that is to identify the types of speech errors, to tabulate the frequency of each type of speech error and the dominant of speech error, and to elaborate the sources of speech errors in the talk show program of Metro TV Face to Face with Desi Anwar broadcasted in January to June 2012. The method used is descriptive and library research. The data are utterances containing speech errors produced by guest speakers. The method of collecting data is documentation. Investigator triangulation is applied by cross checking the findings or the interpretation of data with expert judgement in order to strengthen the validity. The technique for analyzing data is error analysis. The results show that there are 253 utterances containing 428 speech errors which are derived from 9 types of speech errors based on Clark and Clark, Gleason and Ratner, and Poulisse theory. The distribution of each type of error is started by 143 filled pauses (33.41%). The number of speech errors are followed by 121 repeats (29.88%), 49 slips of the tongue (12.10%), 39 retraced false starts (9.63%), 18 corrections (4.44%), 18 unretraced false starts (4.44%), 17 interjections (4.20%), 12 silent pauses (2.96%), and 11 stutters (2.72%). From the frequency of the speech errors, it can be drawn that the most dominant of speech error is filled pause. The speech errors are mostly caused by three sources; they are cognitive difficulty, situational anxiety, and social reasons. 
546 |a en 
546 |a en 
546 |a en 
546 |a en 
546 |a en 
546 |a en 
546 |a en 
546 |a en 
546 |a en 
690 |a P Philology. Linguistics 
655 7 |a Thesis  |2 local 
655 7 |a NonPeerReviewed  |2 local 
787 0 |n https://eprints.ums.ac.id/26519/ 
787 0 |n S200110053 
856 \ \ |u https://eprints.ums.ac.id/26519/  |z Connect to this object online