Interlanguage Errors In Recount Text Made By Second Year Students Of SMP Negeri 1 Japah In 2013/2014 Academic Year

• Main Authors: Wahyuningsih, Wiwin (Author), , Siti Fatimah, S. Pd, M. Hum (Author), , Prof. Dr. Endang Fauziati, M. Hum (Author)
• Format: Book
• Published: 2014.
• Subjects: Thesis; NonPeerReviewed
• Online Access: Connect to this object online
• Notes: https://eprints.ums.ac.id/29594/1/FRONT_PAGE.pdf; https://eprints.ums.ac.id/29594/4/CHAPTER_I.pdf; https://eprints.ums.ac.id/29594/7/CHAPTER_II.pdf; https://eprints.ums.ac.id/29594/8/CHAPTER_III.pdf; https://eprints.ums.ac.id/29594/13/CHAPTER_IV.pdf; https://eprints.ums.ac.id/29594/14/CHAPTER_V.pdf; https://eprints.ums.ac.id/29594/18/BIBLIOGRAPHY.pdf; https://eprints.ums.ac.id/29594/19/APPENDIX.pdf; https://eprints.ums.ac.id/29594/20/PUBLICATION.pdf
• Keywords: LB Theory and practice of education

This research aims at analyzing errors which are made by second year students of SMP Negeri 1 Japah in writing essays on 'recount' text. recount text made by second year students of smp negeri 1 japah in 2013/2014 academic year. The objective of this research is to describe the errors made in the recount text written by the second year students of SMP Negeri 1 Japah., especially (1) To identify the types of lexical errors, (2) To identify the types of syntactical errors, (3) To identify the types of discourse errors, (4) To know the frequency of each type of errors, (5) To explain the dominant type of error, (6) To identify the source of error. This research belongs to descriptive qualitative research. In collecting the data, the writer applies giving writing test to the students then documentation of students' essays. The writer analyzes twenty five students' worksheet. Their errors are then classified into groups after are indentified. Next, errors are analyzed by means of the theory of linguistic category taxonomy and surface strategy taxonomy. The result of this research shows that (1) there are three levels of errors. The writer finds lexical level consist of the of wrong spelling with 73 errors or 14,45%, False friend with 49 errors or 9,70%, misselection of word form with 2 errors or 0,39%, the use of article with 59 errors or 11,68%, and Code switching with 15 errors or 2,97%. Syntactical level consists of The use of tense with 97 errors or 19,21%, The use of preposition with 73 errors or 14,46%, Word order with 30 errors or 5,94%, The use of to be with 45 errors or 8,91%, The use of pronoun with 11 errors or 2,18%, The use of noun with 5 errors or 0,99%, The use of subject with 13 errors or 2,57%, The use of modal with 7 errors or 1,38%, and The use of conjunction with 14 errors or 2,77%. Discourse level consists of 1 errors or 0,19% generic structure, and 1 errors or 0,19% inappropriate pronoun. (2) the dominant of errors is the use of tense errors. There is 97 or 19,21%, it means that the students still have difficulties in this area, (3) there are two sources of errors, namely interlingual transfer and intralingual transfer.