Comparative Error Analysis In Writing Recount Text Made By The First And The Third Semester Students Of English Department UMS 2014/2015 Academic Year

The objectives of the study are to describe the types of error made by the first and the third semester students of English Department UMS 2014/ 2015 academic year and to find the similarities and the differences of the types of error which are made by the first and the third semester students of En...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Perdana, Hestuningtyas Maharani (Author), , Prof. Dr. Endang Fauziati, M. Hum (Author), , Nur Hidayat, S. Pd, M. Pd (Author)
Format: Book
Published: 2015.
Subjects:
Online Access:Connect to this object online
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!

MARC

LEADER 00000 am a22000003u 4500
001 repoums_32999
042 |a dc 
100 1 0 |a Perdana, Hestuningtyas Maharani  |e author 
700 1 0 |a , Prof. Dr. Endang Fauziati, M. Hum  |e author 
700 1 0 |a , Nur Hidayat, S. Pd, M. Pd  |e author 
245 0 0 |a Comparative Error Analysis In Writing Recount Text Made By The First And The Third Semester Students Of English Department UMS 2014/2015 Academic Year 
260 |c 2015. 
500 |a https://eprints.ums.ac.id/32999/1/03.%20FRONT%20PAGE.pdf 
500 |a https://eprints.ums.ac.id/32999/4/04.%20CHAPTER%20I.pdf 
500 |a https://eprints.ums.ac.id/32999/6/05.%20CHAPTER%20II.pdf 
500 |a https://eprints.ums.ac.id/32999/7/06.%20CHAPTER%20III.pdf 
500 |a https://eprints.ums.ac.id/32999/8/07.%20CHAPTER%20IV.pdf 
500 |a https://eprints.ums.ac.id/32999/9/08.%20CHAPTER%20V.pdf 
500 |a https://eprints.ums.ac.id/32999/10/09.%20BIBLIOGRAPHY.pdf 
500 |a https://eprints.ums.ac.id/32999/11/10.%20APPENDIX.pdf 
500 |a https://eprints.ums.ac.id/32999/13/10.%20APPENDIX.pdf 
500 |a https://eprints.ums.ac.id/32999/14/02.%20RESEARCH%20ARTICLE.pdf 
520 |a The objectives of the study are to describe the types of error made by the first and the third semester students of English Department UMS 2014/ 2015 academic year and to find the similarities and the differences of the types of error which are made by the first and the third semester students of English Department UMS 2014/ 2015 academic year. This study is qualitative research. The data are taken from all interlanguage errors which are made by the student's writing recount text. The technique for analyzing data is by exploring, reducing, categorizing, and checking the data validity. The results of this study are: (1) the types of error which are found on the first and the third semester students are morphological error and syntactical error. Syntactical error is the most types of error, which has appeared, (2) the similar types of error that are made by the first and the third semester students is morphological and syntactical error, (3) the differentt types of error happened in the syntactical error only. There were some types of error that made by the first semester students but the third semester students did not, namely in omission of indefinite article (a/ an), omission of introductory THERE as subject, verb II is used after 'modal' form, misplace of conjunction, omission of phrasal verb, omission of preposition in the sentences, and wrong arrangement of phrase. 
546 |a en 
546 |a en 
546 |a en 
546 |a en 
546 |a en 
546 |a en 
546 |a en 
546 |a en 
546 |a en 
546 |a en 
690 |a LB Theory and practice of education 
655 7 |a Thesis  |2 local 
655 7 |a NonPeerReviewed  |2 local 
787 0 |n https://eprints.ums.ac.id/32999/ 
787 0 |n A320110021 
856 \ \ |u https://eprints.ums.ac.id/32999/  |z Connect to this object online