Interlanguage Pragmatics Of Criticism Among The Students Of SMA 2 Mejayan

The purpose of this study is exploring the strategy of criticism employed by the students of SMA 2 Mejayan. This study applies descriptive qualitative research. The data in this research were collected by giving discourse completion task (DCT) to 40 students. The DCT comprises nine scenarios of situ...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Suharno, Mr. (Author), , Agus Wijayanto, Ph.D (Author), , Dr. Anam Sutopo, M.Hum (Author)
Format: Book
Published: 2015-10-28.
Subjects:
Online Access:Connect to this object online
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!

MARC

LEADER 00000 am a22000003u 4500
001 repoums_38725
042 |a dc 
100 1 0 |a Suharno, Mr.  |e author 
700 1 0 |a , Agus Wijayanto, Ph.D  |e author 
700 1 0 |a , Dr. Anam Sutopo, M.Hum  |e author 
245 0 0 |a Interlanguage Pragmatics Of Criticism Among The Students Of SMA 2 Mejayan 
260 |c 2015-10-28. 
500 |a https://eprints.ums.ac.id/38725/1/ARTIKEL%20PUBLIKASI.pdf 
500 |a https://eprints.ums.ac.id/38725/4/HALAMAN%20DEPAN.pdf 
500 |a https://eprints.ums.ac.id/38725/5/BAB%201.pdf 
500 |a https://eprints.ums.ac.id/38725/6/BAB%202.pdf 
500 |a https://eprints.ums.ac.id/38725/11/BAB%203.pdf 
500 |a https://eprints.ums.ac.id/38725/12/BAB%204.pdf 
500 |a https://eprints.ums.ac.id/38725/16/BAB%205.pdf 
500 |a https://eprints.ums.ac.id/38725/17/BIBLIOGRAPHY.pdf 
500 |a https://eprints.ums.ac.id/38725/22/LAMPIRAN%20.pdf 
500 |a https://eprints.ums.ac.id/38725/23/SURAT%20PERNYATAAN%20PUBLIKASI%20ILMIAH.pdf 
520 |a The purpose of this study is exploring the strategy of criticism employed by the students of SMA 2 Mejayan. This study applies descriptive qualitative research. The data in this research were collected by giving discourse completion task (DCT) to 40 students. The DCT comprises nine scenarios of situation which require the students to elicit criticism. The document containing the data of criticism strategy then analyzed based on Nguyen strategy of criticism. The result of the analysis showed some findings. First, the participants tended to employ indirect criticism. Second, the strategy of negative evaluation, request for change, advice about change, and demand for change were dominantly applied over the others in almost status levels. However, some uses of the strategies were inappropriate. This may indicate that the pragmatic competence of the students about the target language is still poor. This poorness could be due to the lack of exposure about the social function of the target language. The various types of criticism strategy applied by the participants indicates that difference status level and social distance may influence their choice of criticism strategies. 
546 |a en 
546 |a en 
546 |a en 
546 |a en 
546 |a en 
546 |a en 
546 |a en 
546 |a en 
546 |a en 
546 |a en 
690 |a P Philology. Linguistics 
655 7 |a Thesis  |2 local 
655 7 |a NonPeerReviewed  |2 local 
787 0 |n https://eprints.ums.ac.id/38725/ 
787 0 |n S200120048 
856 \ \ |u https://eprints.ums.ac.id/38725/  |z Connect to this object online