An Error Analysis In Writing Recount Text Made By Students Of 8th Grade In SMP N 1 Gatak 2015/2016 Academic Year

The aims of this research are: (1) to identify the types of errors in writing recount text made by students of 8th grade in SMP N 1 Gatak 2015/2016 academic year, (2) to identify the types of morphological errors, syntactical errors, and discourse errors, and also count the frequency of each types o...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: SARI, Ega Novia (Author), , Prof. Dr. Endang Fauziati, M. Hum (Author), , Nur Hidayat, M. Pd (Author)
Format: Book
Published: 2016-05-10.
Subjects:
Online Access:Connect to this object online
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!

MARC

LEADER 00000 am a22000003u 4500
001 repoums_43811
042 |a dc 
100 1 0 |a SARI, Ega Novia  |e author 
700 1 0 |a , Prof. Dr. Endang Fauziati, M. Hum  |e author 
700 1 0 |a , Nur Hidayat, M. Pd.  |e author 
245 0 0 |a An Error Analysis In Writing Recount Text Made By Students Of 8th Grade In SMP N 1 Gatak 2015/2016 Academic Year 
260 |c 2016-05-10. 
500 |a https://eprints.ums.ac.id/43811/3/PUBLICATION%20ARTICLE.pdf 
500 |a https://eprints.ums.ac.id/43811/1/FRONT%20PAGE.pdf 
500 |a https://eprints.ums.ac.id/43811/4/CHAPTER%20I.pdf 
500 |a https://eprints.ums.ac.id/43811/5/CHAPTER%20II.pdf 
500 |a https://eprints.ums.ac.id/43811/6/CHAPTER%20III.pdf 
500 |a https://eprints.ums.ac.id/43811/10/CHAPTER%20IV.pdf 
500 |a https://eprints.ums.ac.id/43811/11/CHAPTER%20V.pdf 
500 |a https://eprints.ums.ac.id/43811/12/BIBLIOGRAPHY.pdf 
500 |a https://eprints.ums.ac.id/43811/17/APPENDIX.pdf 
500 |a https://eprints.ums.ac.id/43811/15/SURAT%20PERNYATAAN%20ARTIKEL%20PUBLIKASI.PDF 
520 |a The aims of this research are: (1) to identify the types of errors in writing recount text made by students of 8th grade in SMP N 1 Gatak 2015/2016 academic year, (2) to identify the types of morphological errors, syntactical errors, and discourse errors, and also count the frequency of each types of errors, (3) to describe the sources of errors. The type of this research is descriptive qualitative research. In collecting data, the researcher uses elicitation technique. In analyzing the data, the researcher uses the theory of James for classifying the errors, and uses Brown‟s theory for sources of the errors. The result of this research shows that in morphological error, there are 67 errors or 33.17% of errors. Then, in syntactical error, the researcher found 132 errors or 65.35% of errors. Lastly, in discourse errors, the researcher found 3 errors or 1.49% of errors. Those errors are divided into two sources, namely interlingual transfer and intralingual transfer. 
546 |a en 
546 |a en 
546 |a en 
546 |a en 
546 |a en 
546 |a en 
546 |a en 
546 |a en 
546 |a en 
546 |a en 
690 |a L Education (General) 
690 |a P Philology. Linguistics 
655 7 |a Thesis  |2 local 
655 7 |a NonPeerReviewed  |2 local 
787 0 |n https://eprints.ums.ac.id/43811/ 
787 0 |n A320120066 
856 \ \ |u https://eprints.ums.ac.id/43811/  |z Connect to this object online