Teacher Talk In English Teaching And Learning Process AT SMK Batik 1 Surakarta In 2015/ 2016 Academic Year
This study was descriptive qualitative study concerning with Teacher Talk. The objectives of this study were to identify the categories of Teacher Talk found in Engish teaching and learning process and to identify the dominant category of Teacher Talk found in English teaching and learning process....
Saved in:
| Main Authors: | , , |
|---|---|
| Format: | Book |
| Published: |
2016.
|
| Subjects: | |
| Online Access: | Connect to this object online |
| Tags: |
Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
|
| Summary: | This study was descriptive qualitative study concerning with Teacher Talk. The objectives of this study were to identify the categories of Teacher Talk found in Engish teaching and learning process and to identify the dominant category of Teacher Talk found in English teaching and learning process. The data used in this study were the transcripts of teaching and learning process in English classroom. The technique of collecting data in this study was observation. There were two male teachers and one female teacher who were observed in thi study. There were four steps in analyzing data namely rereading, coding, tabulating and drawing conclusion. The data were analyzed by using Foreign Language Interaction (FLINT) theory proposed by (Moskowitz, 1976). The results of the study showed that there were only 9 categories from 11 categories of Teacher Talk found in English teaching and learning process, category 2 (praising or encouraging), 2a (making joke), 3 (using idea of the student), 3a (repeating student response verbatim), 4 (asking question), 5 (giving information), 5a (correcting without rejection), 6 (giving directions) and 7 (criticizing student's behavior). Nevertheless, there were also some utterances that cannot be classified into FLINT theory, these being: assalamualaikum, good morning, and good afternoon. The dominant category of Teacher Talk found in English teaching and learning process were asking question (category 4) and giving information (category 5). In this study, both male teachers articulated category 4 more than other categories. On the other hand, the female teacher tended to use category 5 (giving information). |
|---|---|
| Item Description: | https://eprints.ums.ac.id/44202/1/PUBLICATION%20ARTICLE.pdf https://eprints.ums.ac.id/44202/26/FRONT%20PAGE.pdf https://eprints.ums.ac.id/44202/3/CHAPTER%20I.pdf https://eprints.ums.ac.id/44202/4/CHAPTER%20II.pdf https://eprints.ums.ac.id/44202/5/CHAPTER%20III.pdf https://eprints.ums.ac.id/44202/6/CHAPTER%20IV.pdf https://eprints.ums.ac.id/44202/8/CHAPTER%20V.pdf https://eprints.ums.ac.id/44202/17/BIBLIOGRAPHY.pdf https://eprints.ums.ac.id/44202/20/APPENDIX.pdf https://eprints.ums.ac.id/44202/21/SURAT%20PERNYATAAN%20PUBLIKASI%20ILMIAH.pdf |