Evaluasi Kelayakan Investasi Proyek Perumahan Dan Tingkat Kepuasan Konsumen Perumahan (Studi Kasus : Shapira Town House Paulan Karanganyar)

• Main Authors: Prasetya, Heru (Author), , Budi Priyanto, S.T., M.T (Author)
• Format: Book
• Published: 2016.
• Subjects: Thesis; NonPeerReviewed
• Online Access: Connect to this object online
• Notes: https://eprints.ums.ac.id/47134/1/Naskah%20Publikasi.pdf; https://eprints.ums.ac.id/47134/25/Halaman%20Depan.pdf; https://eprints.ums.ac.id/47134/5/BAB%20I.pdf; https://eprints.ums.ac.id/47134/6/BAB%20II.pdf; https://eprints.ums.ac.id/47134/7/BAB%20III.pdf; https://eprints.ums.ac.id/47134/13/BAB%20IV.pdf; https://eprints.ums.ac.id/47134/14/BAB%20V.pdf; https://eprints.ums.ac.id/47134/15/DAFTAR%20PUSTAKA.pdf; https://eprints.ums.ac.id/47134/20/Lampiran.pdf; https://eprints.ums.ac.id/47134/23/Surat%20pernyataan%20publikasi%20ilmiah.pdf
• Keywords: TA Civil Engineering

Business property provides a greater opportunity in Karanganyar city and surrounding areas. strategic location between major cities such as Solo, Sukoharjo and Boyolali. This it gets the attention of developers who develop residential business was Mr. Santo in development projects Shapira Town House located in the village Paulan, Colomadu sub-district, Karanganyar district. Based on the result of the research budget planning costs (RAB) Shapira Town House residence project that is amounting to Rp 5,513,094,000.00 and the calculation of total sales revenue 24 unnit home Rp 14,038,664,000.00. In terms of economic and financial investment in this project are feasible or viable. The result of the calculation of NPV of Rp 886,280,000.00, the resulting NPV is positive, suggests that the investment is feasible or viable. IRR (Internal Rate of Return) = 26.88%> rate of interest = 12%, so the investment is feasible or deserved. BCR value (Benefit Cost Ratio) = 1.09> 1, so that the investment is feasible or viable. Payback calculations Pariod or long payback investasi on housing projects Shapira Town House for 1 year and 4 months or in the 2nd. From several indicator that accupant or costumers generally is statisfied presentation of statisfaction about price of house reacher (80%) responden were statisfied. The statisfaction of accupant abaut house reacher (81%) responden were statisfied. the statisfaction of accupant about house facillity insfrastructure reacher (83,33%) responden were statisfied. The statisfaction abaut aksesibility of house (30%) responden were statisfied. , (20,50%) responden were not statisfied, and (47,50%) responden were statisfied are in netral and reguler on accessibility from hausing. From variables of statisfaction level the responden have CS calculation value below of CS table value. Whice means there is no signification with variables and the in habitants of small type with the house hold respondent large.