Kemampuan Komunikasi Matematis Siswa Kelas VII SMP Negeri 3 Sukoharjo Tahun Pelajaran 2016/2017

• Main Authors: ATMOKO, DWI (Author), , Prof. Dr. Abdul Ngalim, M.M.,M.Hum (Author), , Dr. Tjipto Subadi, M.Si (Author)
• Format: Book
• Published: 2016.
• Subjects: Thesis; NonPeerReviewed
• Online Access: Connect to this object online
• Notes: https://eprints.ums.ac.id/47305/1/NASKAH%20PUBLIKASI.pdf; https://eprints.ums.ac.id/47305/2/HALAMAN%20DEPAN.pdf; https://eprints.ums.ac.id/47305/4/BAB%20I.pdf; https://eprints.ums.ac.id/47305/5/BAB%20II.pdf; https://eprints.ums.ac.id/47305/6/BAB%20III.pdf; https://eprints.ums.ac.id/47305/8/BAB%20IV.pdf; https://eprints.ums.ac.id/47305/7/BAB%20V.pdf; https://eprints.ums.ac.id/47305/9/DAFTAR%20PUSTAKA.pdf; https://eprints.ums.ac.id/47305/10/LAMPIRAN.pdf; https://eprints.ums.ac.id/47305/11/PERNYATAAN%20PUBLIKASI.pdf
• Keywords: L Education (General)

The research objective to describe the mathematical communication skills early mathematical ability students of high, medium and low on the grammatical aspects, sociolinguistic, strategic, and understand discourse. Qualitative research using ethnographic design. Where research SMP Negeri 3 Sukoharjo. When the study July to September 2016. The subjects were nine students of class VII H SMP Negeri 3 Sukoharjo Academic Year 2016/2017. The sampling technique with proportional random sampling. Data collection techniques with in-depth interviews, observation and documentation. Data analysis techniques with data reduction, data presentation, and conclusion. The validity of the data by comparing the time triangulation between data based interview first task with task-based interview data II. The ability to communicate research results mathematically capable students early mathematics: 1) Height: (a) the grammatical, students are able to meet all of the indicators except for a definition of fractions; (b) sociolinguistics, students are able to read notation inequality integers and fractions for other unmet indikaor; (c) strategic, students were only able to meet the indicator integers; (d) understand the discourse, the students meet all the indicators except provide a logical argument on fractions. 2) Average, (a) the grammatical, students are able to meet all of the indicators except for a definition of fractions; (b) sociolinguistics, students are able to meet all of the indicators even though there is a rudimentary indicator; (c) strategic, students are able to meet all the indicators although no indicator is not perfect; (d) understand the discourse, students are able to meet all of the indicators. 3) Low: (a) the grammatical, students are able to meet all of the indicators except for a definition of fractions and fractional arithmetic operations; (b) sociolinguistics, students have not been able to meet all the indicators except for being able to read notation inequality integers and fractions; (c) strategic, students do not meet all indkator perfectly; (d) understand the discourse, the student has not met all the indicators.