Commanding Utterances Used In The Noble Qur'an Chapter Ta-Ha: A Pragmatic Perspective

• Main Authors: Tafsir, Muhammad (Author), , Dr. Maryadi, M.A (Author)
• Format: Book
• Published: 2017.
• Subjects: Thesis; NonPeerReviewed
• Online Access: Connect to this object online
• Notes: https://eprints.ums.ac.id/53693/2/FRONT%20PAGE.pdf; https://eprints.ums.ac.id/53693/3/CHAPTER%20I.pdf; https://eprints.ums.ac.id/53693/4/CHAPTER%20II.pdf; https://eprints.ums.ac.id/53693/5/CHAPTER%20III.pdf; https://eprints.ums.ac.id/53693/6/CHAPTER%20IV.pdf; https://eprints.ums.ac.id/53693/7/CHAPTER%20V.pdf; https://eprints.ums.ac.id/53693/8/BIBLIOGRAPHY.pdf; https://eprints.ums.ac.id/53693/9/APPENDIX.pdf; https://eprints.ums.ac.id/53693/10/SURAT%20PERNYATAAN.pdf; https://eprints.ums.ac.id/53693/11/PUBLICATION%20ARTICLE-2.pdf
• Keywords: P Philology. Linguistics

ABSTRACT Muhammad Tafsir. A320130236. COMMANDING UTTERANCES USED IN THE NOBLE QUR'AN CHAPTER TA-HA: A PRAGMATIC PERSPECTIVE. Research Paper. Muhammadiyah University of Surakarta. 2017. This research is aimed (1) at identifying the Pragmalinguistics of commanding utterances used in the Noble Qur'an Chapter Ta-Ha, (2) at describing the implicature of commanding utterances used in the Noble Qur'an Chapter Ta-Ha, (3) at describing the maxim violation of commanding utterances used in the Noble Qur'an Chapter Ta-Ha. The type of this research uses descriptive qualitative. The data source of this research is taken from Noble Qur'an Chapter Ta-Ha. The data of this research is verses of Chapter Ta-Ha that is included commanding utterance. The researcher collects data with observation and documentation. As the result, The researcher finds (1) Declarative Sentence (4%), and Imperative Sentence (96%). The most pragmalinguistics based on type of sentence that is used in this research is Imperative Sentence (96%). The researcher finds (2) generalized conversational implicature (43%), and particularized conversational implicature (57%). The most implicature type that is used in this research is particularized conversational implicature (57%). The researcher also finds (3) violation of relevance (71%), and violation of manner (29%). The most maxim violation type that is used in this research is violation of relevance (71%). Keywords: commanding utterance, pragmaliguistics, implicature.