PENERAPAN METODE KOOPERATIF TALKING CHIPS PADA MATA PELAJARAN UTILITAS BANGUNAN SISWA KELAS XI TGB DI SMK NEGERI 9 GARUT

• Main Author: Putriana, Rafida (Author)
• Format: Book
• Published: 2016-11-18.
• Subjects: Thesis; NonPeerReviewed
• Online Access: Link Metadata

Summary

Penelitian ini bertujuan untuk mengetahui perbedaan hasil dan motivasi belajar antara siswa yang pembelajarannya menerapkan metode kooperatif Talking Chips dengan siswa yang pembelajarannya tanpa menerapkan metode kooperatif Talking Chips. Penelitian ini dilaksanakan pada mata pelajaran Utilitas Bangunan bagi siswa kelas XI Teknik Gambar Bangunan (TGB) di SMK Negeri 9 Garut. Metode penelitian yang digunakan adalah metode desain true experimental dengan jenis posttest only control group design dengan populasi penelitian adalah siswa kelas XI TGB SMK Negeri 9 Garut. Sedangkan sampel penelitian berjumlah 40 siswa, yaitu siswa kelas XI TGB 2 sebagai kelas eksperimen berjumlah 20 siswa dan XI TGB 1 sebagai kelas kontrol berjumlah 20 siswa. Instrumen penelitian yang digunakan meliputi tes dan angket. Data yang diperoleh dianalisis menggunakan bantuan program SPSS 22.0 for windows. Nilai rata-rata hasil belajar kelompok eksperimen adalah 82, sedangkan kelompok kontrol 65,25. Berdasarkan hasil uji hipotesis Mann-Whitney diperoleh Asymp. Sig. (2-tailed) 0.01, sehingga Ho ditolak. Nilai rata-rata metode kooperatif Talking Chips lebih besar 16,75 dibandingkan dengan nilai rata-rata hasil belajar pembelajaran konvensional. Hasil belajar metode kooperatif Talking Chips lebih unggul dibandingkan dengan metode konvensional. Nilai rata-rata motivasi belajar kelompok eksperimen adalah 137,05, sedangkan kelompok kontrol 113,55. Berdasarkan hasil uji hipotesis Mann-Whitney diperoleh Asymp. Sig. (2-tailed) 0.00, sehingga Ho ditolak. Nilai rata-rata motivasi belajar metode kooperatif Talking Chips lebih besar 23,5 dibandingkan dengan nilai rata-rata pembelajaran konvensional. Motivasi belajar metode kooperatif Talking Chips lebih unggul dibandingkan dengan metode konvensional. ;---This research aimed to investigate the difference of the learning outcomes and learning motivation between the students in which Talking Chips cooperative method was implemented in the learning. This research was conducted in Building Utility subject for Class XI Building Drawing Technique students at SMK Negeri 9 Garut. This research used true experimental design method with the posttest only control group design. The population of this research were the students of class XI TGB SMK 9 Garut. Meanwhile, the sample of this research were 40 students, in which 20 students of class XI TGB 2 as experimental class and 20 students of class XI TGB 1 as control class. The instrument of this research were tests and questionnaires. The data analyzed by using SPSS 22.0 program for windows. The average score of the experimental class learning outcomes was 82, meanwhile for the control class was 65,25. According to the Mann-Whitney hypothesis experiment result, Asymp. Sig. (2-tailed) 0.01 was obtained. Hence, Ho was rejected. The average score of Talking Chips cooperative method was higher 16,75 compared to the average score of the learning outcomes of the conventional learning. The learning outcomes of Talking Chips cooperative method was more superior compared to the conventional method. The average score of the experimental group's learning motivation was 137,05, and the control group was 113,55. According to the Mann-Whitney hypothesis experiment, it was obtained that Asymp. Sig. (2-tailed) 0.00, hence Ho was rejected. The average score of learning motivation of Talking Chips cooperative method was 23,5 higher compared to the average score of the conventional learning. The learning motivation of the Talking Chips cooperative method was more superior compared to the conventional method.

Item Description

http://repository.upi.edu/27369/1/S_TA_1203951_Title.pdf
http://repository.upi.edu/27369/2/S_TA_1203951_Abstract.pdf
http://repository.upi.edu/27369/3/S_TA_1203951_Table_of_content.pdf
http://repository.upi.edu/27369/4/S_TA_1203951_Chapter1.pdf
http://repository.upi.edu/27369/5/S_TA_1203951_Chapter2.pdf
http://repository.upi.edu/27369/6/S_TA_1203951_Chapter3.pdf
http://repository.upi.edu/27369/7/S_TA_1203951_Chapter4.pdf
http://repository.upi.edu/27369/8/S_TA_1203951_Chapter5.pdf
http://repository.upi.edu/27369/9/S_TA_1203951_Bibliography.pdf
http://repository.upi.edu/27369/10/S_TA_1203951_Appendix.pdf