THE PROFILE OF STUDENTS' CONCEPT MASTERY AND SCIENTIFIC ARGUMENTATION SKILL IN LEARNING GLOBAL WARMING AT SEKOLAH INDONESIA KUALA LUMPUR

• Main Author: Layyinah, Syifa Qalbiyatul (Author)
• Format: Book
• Published: 2017-08-30.
• Subjects: Thesis; NonPeerReviewed
• Online Access: Link Metadata
• Notes: http://repository.upi.edu/30820/1/S_IPSE_1300698_Title.pdf; http://repository.upi.edu/30820/2/S_IPSE_1300698_Abstract.pdf; http://repository.upi.edu/30820/3/S_IPSE_1300698_Table_of_Content.pdf; http://repository.upi.edu/30820/4/S_IPSE_1300698_Chapter1.pdf; http://repository.upi.edu/30820/5/S_IPSE_1300698_Chapter2.pdf; http://repository.upi.edu/30820/6/S_IPSE_1300698_Chapter3.pdf; http://repository.upi.edu/30820/7/S_IPSE_1300698_Chapter4.pdf; http://repository.upi.edu/30820/8/S_IPSE_1300698_Chapter5.pdf; http://repository.upi.edu/30820/9/S_IPSE_1300698_Bibliography.pdf; http://repository.upi.edu/30820/10/S_IPSE_1300698_Appendix.pdf
• Keywords: L Education (General); LB Theory and practice of education; QH Natural history

The aim of this research is to obtain general descriptions about students' concept mastery and scientific argumentation skill qualities in oral and written scientific argumentation in learning global warming; the correlation between oral and written scientific argumentation skill; the correlation between students' concept mastery and scientific argumentation skill; and students'perspective towards their scientific argumentation skill. The method used in this study was descriptive correlational research. Seventh grade students from Sekolah Indonesia Kuala Lumpur were tested. Generally, the concept mastery based on Bloom Taxonomy revised mean score shows a satisfactory attainments level, with the range (59,6 ≤ score ≤ 74,22). Scientific argumentation quality determined based on Toulmin Argumentation Pattern and the level based onErduran et al.,(2004). All argumentation levels from level 1 to level 5 could be identified both in oral and written.The most argumentation appeared in both oral and written scientific argumentation is relatively low (level 2 of 5 levels). The higher quality of scientific argumentation is in oral argumentatien, since oral argumentation gets higher percentage in level 4 and 5. Moreover, there is medium positive correlation (r = +0,594) between students' concept mastery and oral scientific argumentation skill, and (r = +0,449) between students' concept mastery and written scientific argumentation skill. Based on Likert scale on questionnaire and interview result, most students had positive perspective towards their scientific argumentation skill. Keywords: Concept Mastery, Scientific Argumentation Skill, Global Warming