US RIGHT OF VETO AGAINST UN RESOLUTION ON TERRORISM OF ISIS FOREIGN MILITIAS

• Main Author: Annisa Farras Tsabitah, (Author)
• Format: Book
• Published: Annisa Farras Tsabitah, 2021-02-28.
• Subjects: Article; PeerReviewed
• Online Access: Link Metadata
• Notes: http://repository.upnvj.ac.id/10644/1/1710611302_ArtikelKI.pdf
• Keywords: K Law (General)

This article analyses how the US proposes the right of veto in the UN-issued resolution concerning anti-terrorism, namely Persecution, Reintegration, and Rehabilitation system of foreign ISIS militants who are stranded in Syrian camps. How the veto of United States position on ISIS foreign prisoners has the potential to violate the veto provisions based on the UDHR, International Humanitarian Law, as well as the 1949 Geneva Convention and its Additional Protocols I and II 1997. This study was conducted to determine the effect of the US veto on the fate of ISIS foreign militias and the efforts and steps that could be taken to resolve the ISIS Foreign Militia problem from the perspective of international law. The research method employed in this study was juridical normative. A study found that the PRR resolution on ISIS foreign militias was canceled with the issuance of a veto by the United States. Several efforts can be made in dealing with this including maintaining the role of the PRR on foreign ISI militants detained in Syria holding camps, focusing on handling foreign ISIS militias, and countering terrorism through related conventions, such as the Universal Declaration of Human Rights (UDHR), The 1949 Geneva Convention, and Additional Protocols I and II of 1977, as well as continuing to urge all member states and all parties that all action taken against terrorism are required to meet obligations under international law, including humanitarian law, international human rights law, and international refugee law by still considering the impact of those actions.