KEDUDUKAN PERMOHONAN PUTUSAN PROVISI DALAM HAK UJI MATERI (JUDICIAL REVIEW) PADA HUKUM ACARA MAHKAMAH KONSTITUSI

The idea of establishing a Constitutional Court (MK) is one of the developments in modern legal and state thinking that emerged in the 20th century. After the New Order, the institutional structure of the state underwent changes, one of which was the formation of the Constitutional Court through the...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Main Author: Antonius Julio Parlindungan, (Author)
Format: Book
Published: 2021-07-13.
Subjects:
Online Access:Link Metadata
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
Description
Summary:The idea of establishing a Constitutional Court (MK) is one of the developments in modern legal and state thinking that emerged in the 20th century. After the New Order, the institutional structure of the state underwent changes, one of which was the formation of the Constitutional Court through the third amendment to the 1945 Constitution (UUD 1945). The establishment of the Constitutional Court as a special tribunal separate from the Supreme Court, which basically tests the compatibility of lower legal norms with higher legal norms. In addition to testing the conformity of legal norms, judicial review can also be carried out if the constitutional rights of the community are not fulfilled by the enactment of a law. If fulfilled, the decision of the Panel of Constitutional Justices can cancel or delete the contents of the products of the legislative body or the government. With a long process in judicial review, a provisional decision is needed as a temporary legal action to prevent or stop the enactment of a law being tested in order to avoid comprehensive legal consequences. The position of the petition for a provisional decision in judicial review is not clearly regulated in the statutory regulations, but in the practice of proceeding at the Constitutional Court in some cases, the result of the decision is in the form of a provisional decision. This study uses a normative juridical method by taking several approaches to the problem that contains aspects of the application for provisions in conducting judicial review of the material.
Item Description:http://repository.upnvj.ac.id/12098/1/ABSTRAK.pdf
http://repository.upnvj.ac.id/12098/3/AWAL.pdf
http://repository.upnvj.ac.id/12098/4/BAB%201.pdf
http://repository.upnvj.ac.id/12098/6/BAB%202.pdf
http://repository.upnvj.ac.id/12098/7/BAB%203.pdf
http://repository.upnvj.ac.id/12098/9/BAB%204.pdf
http://repository.upnvj.ac.id/12098/10/BAB%205.pdf
http://repository.upnvj.ac.id/12098/12/DAFTAR%20PUSTAKA.pdf
http://repository.upnvj.ac.id/12098/13/RIWAYAT%20HIDUP.pdf
http://repository.upnvj.ac.id/12098/15/LAMPIRAN.pdf
http://repository.upnvj.ac.id/12098/16/ARTIKEL%20KI.pdf