PERLINDUNGAN HUKUM BAGI PEMEGANG MEREK TERKENAL DI INDONESIA

The composition on legitimate protection for notable imprints in Indonesia means to discover the lawful insurance for notable imprints dependent on certain law in Indonesia with a component of uniformity fundamentally. Notable brands have an elite nature, yet there are as yet numerous infringement t...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Muhamad Shafwan Afif, (Author), Heru Sugiyono, (Author)
Format: Book
Published: USM LAW REVIEW, Magister Hukum Universitas Semarang, 2021-11.
Subjects:
Online Access:Link Metadata
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!

MARC

LEADER 00000 am a22000003u 4500
001 repoupnvj_15900
042 |a dc 
100 1 0 |a Muhamad Shafwan Afif, .  |e author 
700 1 0 |a Heru Sugiyono, .  |e author 
245 0 0 |a PERLINDUNGAN HUKUM BAGI PEMEGANG MEREK TERKENAL DI INDONESIA 
260 |b USM LAW REVIEW, Magister Hukum Universitas Semarang,   |c 2021-11. 
500 |a http://repository.upnvj.ac.id/15900/1/1810611181_ArtikelKI.pdf 
520 |a The composition on legitimate protection for notable imprints in Indonesia means to discover the lawful insurance for notable imprints dependent on certain law in Indonesia with a component of uniformity fundamentally. Notable brands have an elite nature, yet there are as yet numerous infringement that happen to them like impersonation, pillion and things that put on the map brand proprietors lose. This should be investigated to make solid business contest in the modern world. This review utilizes a standardizing juridical technique. In this review, the oddity is that the conversation centers more around the guideline of notable brands in Indonesia based on essential likenesses and the obligations of the state office, specifically DJKI, for brand names that are dropped by the court since they have similitudes on a basic level with notable brands. The aftereffects of the review are that legitimate security for notable brands is presently controlled to the degree of notable brand standards, restriction of making moves that contain components of similitude on a basic level with notable brands and oppressive endeavors as the option to answer to the court claimed by notable brands, this is expressed in the UU no. 20 of 2016 concerning Brands and Geological Signs, Permenkumham No. 67 of 2016 concerning Brand name Enrollment and High Court Law No. 022/HKI/2012. The type of liability of the DJKI is to do court choices, give lawful guiding and can be rebuffed by the arrangements of the Criminal Code. 
546 |a id 
690 |a K Law (General) 
655 7 |a Article  |2 local 
655 7 |a PeerReviewed  |2 local 
787 0 |n http://repository.upnvj.ac.id/15900/ 
787 0 |n https://journals.usm.ac.id/index.php/julr/article/view/4097 
856 4 1 |u http://repository.upnvj.ac.id/15900/  |z Link Metadata