PENGUATAN KOMISI PEMBERANTASAN KORUPSI SEBAGAI LEMBAGA TERDEPAN PENEGAKAN HUKUM TINDAK PIDANA KORUPSI DI INDONESIA
The enactment of Law Number 19 of 2019 concerning the Second Amendment to Law Number 30 of 2002 concerning the KPK is considered and allegedly the beginning of the weakening of the KPK's performance in eradicating corruption. The inclusion of the KPK in the executive family, a stronger position...
Saved in:
| Main Author: | |
|---|---|
| Format: | Book |
| Published: |
2022-02-05.
|
| Subjects: | |
| Online Access: | Link Metadata |
| Tags: |
Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
|
| Summary: | The enactment of Law Number 19 of 2019 concerning the Second Amendment to Law Number 30 of 2002 concerning the KPK is considered and allegedly the beginning of the weakening of the KPK's performance in eradicating corruption. The inclusion of the KPK in the executive family, a stronger position of the Supervisory Board, the issuance of an Order to Terminate Investigation (SP3) by the KPK and the reduction of the KPK's authority in the investigation process are some of the things regulated in Law Number 19 of 2019 which are considered as a form of weakening the KPK. Meanwhile, on the other hand, the potential and development of corruption cases is increasing and getting more massive. According to the records of Indonesian Corruption Watch in 2020, there are 13 modes of corruption that have occurred and have the potential to harm the state of Rp. 18.1 trillion. This shows the critical number of Extra Ordinary Crime in this country This study aims to answer two questions about how the authority and role of the Corruption Eradication Commission (KPK) in law enforcement for criminal acts of corruption are currently, as well as questions about how to strengthen the authority and role of the Corruption Eradication Commission (KPK) in law enforcement of criminal acts of corruption in the future?. By using a descriptive-analytical method with a normative legal research approach, this study concludes that the role and authority of the Corruption Eradication Commission (KPK) is reduced and its performance has drastically decreased. This is in line with the enactment of Law Number 19 of 2019 concerning the Second Amendment to Law Number 30 of 2002 concerning the KPK which caused the status of the KPK institution to be included in the executive clump, the position of a stronger Supervisory Board, the issuance of an Investigation Termination Order (SP3) by the KPK. as well as trimming the authority of the KPK in the investigation process. Therefore, considering the strategic position of the KPK in eradicating corruption, efforts to strengthen the role and authority of the Corruption Eradication Commission (KPK) in law enforcement of corruption crimes need to be carried out through four strategic steps, namely strengthening the institutional status of the KPK into the 1945 Constitution so as to make this institution a good backbone. governance, and avoid political pressure; Limiting the authority of the KPK Supervisory Board on matters relating to the code of ethics and administrative matters, and does not include pro justicia actions; Recruitment of Independent Investigators outside government institutions whose integrity and independence have been tested; Granting full prosecution authority so as to expedite case handling |
|---|---|
| Item Description: | http://repository.upnvj.ac.id/16321/1/ABSTRAK.pdf http://repository.upnvj.ac.id/16321/2/AWAL.pdf http://repository.upnvj.ac.id/16321/3/BAB%201.pdf http://repository.upnvj.ac.id/16321/4/BAB%202.pdf http://repository.upnvj.ac.id/16321/5/BAB%203.pdf http://repository.upnvj.ac.id/16321/6/BAB%204.pdf http://repository.upnvj.ac.id/16321/7/BAB%205.pdf http://repository.upnvj.ac.id/16321/8/DAFTAR%20PUSTAKA.pdf http://repository.upnvj.ac.id/16321/9/RIWAYAT%20HIDUP.pdf http://repository.upnvj.ac.id/16321/10/LAMPIRAN.pdf http://repository.upnvj.ac.id/16321/11/ARTIKEL%20Kl.pdf |