Tracking Patterns in Self-Regulated Learning Using Students' Self-Reports and Online Trace Data

For decades, self-report instruments - which rely heavily on students' perceptions and beliefs - have been the dominant way of measuring motivation and strategy use. An event-based measure based on online trace data arguably has the potential to remove analytical restrictions of self-report mea...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Nicolette van Halem (Author), Chris van Klaveren (Author), Hendrik Drachsler (Author), Marcel Schmitz (Author), Ilja Cornelisz (Author)
Format: Book
Published: EARLI, 2020-03-01T00:00:00Z.
Subjects:
Online Access:Connect to this object online.
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!

MARC

LEADER 00000 am a22000003u 4500
001 doaj_1aa588e0175e4b968c15b0d5f07e663c
042 |a dc 
100 1 0 |a Nicolette van Halem  |e author 
700 1 0 |a Chris van Klaveren  |e author 
700 1 0 |a Hendrik Drachsler  |e author 
700 1 0 |a Marcel Schmitz  |e author 
700 1 0 |a Ilja Cornelisz  |e author 
245 0 0 |a Tracking Patterns in Self-Regulated Learning Using Students' Self-Reports and Online Trace Data 
260 |b EARLI,   |c 2020-03-01T00:00:00Z. 
500 |a 10.14786/flr.v8i3.497 
500 |a 2295-3159 
520 |a For decades, self-report instruments - which rely heavily on students' perceptions and beliefs - have been the dominant way of measuring motivation and strategy use. An event-based measure based on online trace data arguably has the potential to remove analytical restrictions of self-report measures. The purpose of this study is therefore to triangulate constructs suggested in theory and measured using self-reported data with revealed online traces of learning behaviour. The results show that online trace data of learning behaviour are complementary to self-reports, as they explained a unique proportion of variance in student academic performance and reveal that self-reports explain more variance in online learning behaviour of prior weeks than variance in learning behaviour in succeeding weeks. Student motivation is, however, to a lesser extent captured with online trace data, likely because of its covert nature. In that respect, it is of importance to recognize the crucial role of self-reports in capturing student learning holistically. This manuscript is 'frontline' in the sense that event-based measurement methodologies using online trace data are relatively unexplored. The comparison with self-report data made in this manuscript sheds new light on the added value of innovative and traditional methods of measuring motivation and strategy use. 
546 |a EN 
690 |a Education 
690 |a L 
655 7 |a article  |2 local 
786 0 |n Frontline Learning Research, Vol 8, Iss 3 (2020) 
787 0 |n https://journals.sfu.ca/flr/index.php/journal/article/view/497 
787 0 |n https://doaj.org/toc/2295-3159 
856 4 1 |u https://doaj.org/article/1aa588e0175e4b968c15b0d5f07e663c  |z Connect to this object online.