An Online Ethics Curriculum for Short-Term Global Health Experiences: Evaluating a Decade of Use

Background: Medical students and early career healthcare professionals commonly participate in short-term experiences in global health (STEGH). Objective: The authors evaluate the use of a free-to-access, case-based online curriculum addressing ethical issues trainees should consider prior to engagi...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Chelsea E. Modlin (Author), Matthew DeCamp (Author), Michele Barry (Author), Danica Rockney (Author), Jeremy Sugarman (Author)
Format: Book
Published: Ubiquity Press, 2022-08-01T00:00:00Z.
Subjects:
Online Access:Connect to this object online.
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!

MARC

LEADER 00000 am a22000003u 4500
001 doaj_1af6a9ea3e1e4c5490e3f9852b8b9ac9
042 |a dc 
100 1 0 |a Chelsea E. Modlin  |e author 
700 1 0 |a Matthew DeCamp  |e author 
700 1 0 |a Michele Barry  |e author 
700 1 0 |a Danica Rockney  |e author 
700 1 0 |a Jeremy Sugarman  |e author 
245 0 0 |a An Online Ethics Curriculum for Short-Term Global Health Experiences: Evaluating a Decade of Use 
260 |b Ubiquity Press,   |c 2022-08-01T00:00:00Z. 
500 |a 2214-9996 
500 |a 10.5334/aogh.3716 
520 |a Background: Medical students and early career healthcare professionals commonly participate in short-term experiences in global health (STEGH). Objective: The authors evaluate the use of a free-to-access, case-based online curriculum addressing ethical issues trainees should consider prior to engaging in STEGH. Methods: Demographic data and feedback on specific cases were collected from 5,226 respondents accessing the online curriculum between November 1, 2011 and October 31, 2021. Feedback on the curriculum included 5-point Likert scale and open-ended responses. Quantitative data were analyzed using standard descriptive statistics. Qualitative data were independently dual coded and analyzed thematically in NVivo. Findings: The curriculum reached respondents from 106 countries. Undergraduate (36%) and graduate (38%) respondents included those from several different professional specialties. Less than a quarter of all of respondents, less than half with previous global health experience, and one-third with planned future global health experiences had received prior global health ethics training. Overall, the curriculum was highly rated; respondents felt it provided necessary tools to improve their thought processes, confidence, and behavior when encountering ethical issues during STEGH. Areas for curriculum improvement include balancing case specificity with generalizability. Conclusion: This curriculum has met a need for accessible introductory global health ethics education and demonstrates successful use of an online platform in case-based ethics learning. 
546 |a EN 
690 |a short-term global health experiences 
690 |a global health education 
690 |a ethics education 
690 |a online education 
690 |a case-based education 
690 |a curriculum evaluation 
690 |a Infectious and parasitic diseases 
690 |a RC109-216 
690 |a Public aspects of medicine 
690 |a RA1-1270 
655 7 |a article  |2 local 
786 0 |n Annals of Global Health, Vol 88, Iss 1 (2022) 
787 0 |n https://annalsofglobalhealth.org/articles/3716 
787 0 |n https://doaj.org/toc/2214-9996 
856 4 1 |u https://doaj.org/article/1af6a9ea3e1e4c5490e3f9852b8b9ac9  |z Connect to this object online.