Reporting quality of systematic reviews of interventions aimed at improving vaccination coverage: compliance with PRISMA guidelines
Systematic reviews have become increasingly important for informing clinical practice and policy; however, little is known about the reporting characteristics and quality of SRs of interventions to improve immunization coverage in different settings. The aim of this study was to assess the reporting...
Saved in:
Main Authors: | Valantine Ngum Ndze (Author), Anelisa Jaca (Author), Charles Shey Wiysonge (Author) |
---|---|
Format: | Book |
Published: |
Taylor & Francis Group,
2019-12-01T00:00:00Z.
|
Subjects: | |
Online Access: | Connect to this object online. |
Tags: |
Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
|
Similar Items
-
Assessing the methodological quality of systematic reviews of interventions aimed at improving vaccination coverage using AMSTAR and ROBIS checklists
by: Anelisa Jaca, et al.
Published: (2019) -
A systematic review and meta-analysis of the effects of educating parents on the benefits and schedules of childhood vaccinations in low and middle-income countries
by: Lungeni Auguy Lukusa, et al.
Published: (2018) -
A scoping review of interventions for vaccine stock management in primary health-care facilities
by: Chinwe Juliana Iwu, et al.
Published: (2019) -
Vaccine hesitancy in the era of COVID-19: could lessons from the past help in divining the future?
by: Charles Shey Wiysonge, et al.
Published: (2022) -
A global bibliometric analysis of research productivity on vaccine hesitancy from 1974 to 2019
by: Anelisa Jaca, et al.
Published: (2021)