Follow-Up SARS-CoV-2 PCR Testing Outcomes From a Large Reference Lab in the US

By analyzing COVID-19 sequential COVID-19 test results of patients across the United States, we herein attempt to quantify some of the observations we've made around long-term infection (and false-positive rates), as well as provide observations on the uncertainty of sampling variability and ot...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Adam Sullivan (Author), David Alfego (Author), Brian Poirier (Author), Jonathan Williams (Author), Dorothy Adcock (Author), Stan Letovsky (Author)
Format: Book
Published: Frontiers Media S.A., 2021-05-01T00:00:00Z.
Subjects:
Online Access:Connect to this object online.
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!

MARC

LEADER 00000 am a22000003u 4500
001 doaj_1e51a2e7fe274e189548e7dfbd87d56a
042 |a dc 
100 1 0 |a Adam Sullivan  |e author 
700 1 0 |a David Alfego  |e author 
700 1 0 |a Brian Poirier  |e author 
700 1 0 |a Jonathan Williams  |e author 
700 1 0 |a Dorothy Adcock  |e author 
700 1 0 |a Stan Letovsky  |e author 
245 0 0 |a Follow-Up SARS-CoV-2 PCR Testing Outcomes From a Large Reference Lab in the US 
260 |b Frontiers Media S.A.,   |c 2021-05-01T00:00:00Z. 
500 |a 2296-2565 
500 |a 10.3389/fpubh.2021.679012 
520 |a By analyzing COVID-19 sequential COVID-19 test results of patients across the United States, we herein attempt to quantify some of the observations we've made around long-term infection (and false-positive rates), as well as provide observations on the uncertainty of sampling variability and other dynamics of COVID-19 infection in the United States. Retrospective cohort study of a registry of RT-PCR testing results for all patients tested at any of the reference labs operated by Labcorp® including both positive, negative, and inconclusive results, from March 1, 2020 to January 28, 2021, including patients from all 50 states and outlying US territories. The study included 22 million patients with RT-PCR qualitative test results for SARS-CoV-2, of which 3.9 million had more than one test at Labcorp. We observed a minuscule <0.1% basal positive rate for follow up tests >115 days, which could account for false positives, long-haulers, and/or reinfection but is indistinguishable in the data. In observing repeat-testing, for patients who have a second test after a first RT-PCR, 30% across the cohort tested negative on the second test. For patients who test positive first and subsequently negative within 96 h (40% of positive test results), 18% of tests will subsequently test positive within another 96-h span. For those who first test negative and then positive within 96 h (2.3% of negative tests), 56% will test negative after a third and subsequent 96-h period. The sudden changes in RT-PCR test results for SARS-CoV-2 from this large cohort study suggest that negative test results during active infection or exposure can change rapidly within just days or hours. We also demonstrate that there does not appear to be a basal false positive rate among patients who test positive >115 days after their first RT-PCR positive test while failing to observe any evidence of widespread reinfection. 
546 |a EN 
690 |a COVID-19 
690 |a laboratory 
690 |a repeat infection 
690 |a PCR 
690 |a real world data 
690 |a Public aspects of medicine 
690 |a RA1-1270 
655 7 |a article  |2 local 
786 0 |n Frontiers in Public Health, Vol 9 (2021) 
787 0 |n https://www.frontiersin.org/articles/10.3389/fpubh.2021.679012/full 
787 0 |n https://doaj.org/toc/2296-2565 
856 4 1 |u https://doaj.org/article/1e51a2e7fe274e189548e7dfbd87d56a  |z Connect to this object online.