Exploring indicators of natural recovery from alcohol and drug use problems: findings from the life in recovery survey in Flanders

Abstract Introduction Research has established natural recovery (NR) as an important pathway to substance use recovery. Studies investigating correlates of NR have mainly focused on demographic and substance use variables rather than life circumstances. This study seeks to better understand the phen...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Florian De Meyer (Author), Amine Zerrouk (Author), Clara De Ruysscher (Author), Wouter Vanderplasschen (Author)
Format: Book
Published: BMC, 2024-04-01T00:00:00Z.
Subjects:
Online Access:Connect to this object online.
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!

MARC

LEADER 00000 am a22000003u 4500
001 doaj_1f7bf1b96d1e4064b4fe3d8c77a52882
042 |a dc 
100 1 0 |a Florian De Meyer  |e author 
700 1 0 |a Amine Zerrouk  |e author 
700 1 0 |a Clara De Ruysscher  |e author 
700 1 0 |a Wouter Vanderplasschen  |e author 
245 0 0 |a Exploring indicators of natural recovery from alcohol and drug use problems: findings from the life in recovery survey in Flanders 
260 |b BMC,   |c 2024-04-01T00:00:00Z. 
500 |a 10.1186/s13011-024-00604-y 
500 |a 1747-597X 
520 |a Abstract Introduction Research has established natural recovery (NR) as an important pathway to substance use recovery. Studies investigating correlates of NR have mainly focused on demographic and substance use variables rather than life circumstances. This study seeks to better understand the phenomenon of natural recovery by (i) validating the international scientific literature concerning demographic and substance use indicators of NR in Flanders and (ii) assessing the additional explanatory power of recovery strengths and barriers during active addiction, controlling for demographic and substance use covariates. Methods A total of 343 persons in recovery from alcohol or drug use problems (≥ 3 months) completed an online cross-sectional survey in Flanders. Participants in NR and in recovery after following treatment were compared using multivariate linear regression models. Reasons for not following treatment were analyzed using inductive thematic analysis. Results Higher education level, lower severity of dependence, and cannabis use as the main problem substance (vs. alcohol) were statistically significant (p < 0.05) correlates of NR. When scores for the number of barriers and strengths associated with active addiction were added, barriers (but not strengths) were significantly associated with NR. When barrier items were individually tested, having untreated emotional or mental health problems, having a driver's license revoked and damaging property were statistically significant correlates. The most reported reason for not entering treatment was not experiencing any need to do so. Conclusion The results highlight the importance of a holistic approach to recovery support across multiple life domains. Limitations and opportunities for further research are discussed. 
546 |a EN 
690 |a Substance use disorder 
690 |a Self-change 
690 |a Spontaneous recovery 
690 |a Treatment 
690 |a Recovery capital 
690 |a Public aspects of medicine 
690 |a RA1-1270 
690 |a Social pathology. Social and public welfare. Criminology 
690 |a HV1-9960 
655 7 |a article  |2 local 
786 0 |n Substance Abuse Treatment, Prevention, and Policy, Vol 19, Iss 1, Pp 1-10 (2024) 
787 0 |n https://doi.org/10.1186/s13011-024-00604-y 
787 0 |n https://doaj.org/toc/1747-597X 
856 4 1 |u https://doaj.org/article/1f7bf1b96d1e4064b4fe3d8c77a52882  |z Connect to this object online.