Comparison of validity, repeatability and reproducibility of the Peer Assessment Rating (PAR) between digital and conventional study models
The validity, reliability and inter-method agreement of Peer Assessment Scores (PAR) from acrylic models and their digital analogues were assessed.
Saved in:
Main Authors: | Pasapula Sridhar (Author), Sherriff Martyn (Author), Breckon Jeremy (Author), Bister Dirk (Author), Abela Stefan (Author) |
---|---|
Format: | Book |
Published: |
Sciendo,
2016-01-01T00:00:00Z.
|
Subjects: | |
Online Access: | Connect to this object online. |
Tags: |
Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
|
Similar Items
-
The importance of visual acuity screening in dental education amongst undergraduate dental students: a straightforward method
by: Jaya Pindoria, et al.
Published: (2024) -
Repeatability, Reproducibility, and Concurrent Validity of a Stethoscope and Health App System for the Quantification of Breath Rate in Healthy Adults: Repeatability and Validity Study
by: Ricardo Becerro de Bengoa Vallejo, et al.
Published: (2023) -
In vitro evaluation of surface characteristics comparing WaterLase (Biolase®) with tungsten carbide burs for composite removal: a pilot study
by: Alkandari Mohammed, et al.
Published: (2022) -
Comparison of Cephalometric Measurements Obtained with Conventional and Digital Methods and their Reproducibility
by: Anshu Kalra, et al.
Published: (2010) -
Repeatability and intra-rater reproducibility of a digitalized test of body image perception
by: Emanuelle Francine Detogni Schmit, et al.
Published: (2017)