Randomized Clinical Trial of Azithromycin vs. Erythromycin for the Treatment of Chlamydia Cervicitis in Pregnancy
Objective: The purpose of this study was to prospectively test the null hypothesis that there is no difference in the clinical effectiveness of azithromycin and erythromycin for the treatment of chlamydia cervicitis in pregnancy.
Saved in:
Main Authors: | M. S. Edwards (Author), R. B. Newman (Author), S. G. Carter (Author), F. W. LeBoeuf (Author), M. K. Menard (Author), K. P. Rainwater (Author) |
---|---|
Format: | Book |
Published: |
Hindawi Limited,
1996-01-01T00:00:00Z.
|
Subjects: | |
Online Access: | Connect to this object online. |
Tags: |
Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
|
Similar Items
-
Randomized Trial of Erythromycin and Azithromycin for Treatment of Chlamydial Infection in Pregnancy
by: Marc F. Rosenn, et al.
Published: (1995) -
Randomized Prospective Study Comparing Erythromycin, Amoxicillin, and Clindamycin for the Treatment of Chlamydia trachomatis in Pregnancy
by: Mark A. Turrentine, et al.
Published: (1995) -
A Randomized Trial of Azithromycin Versus Amoxicillin for the Treatment of Chlamydia trachomatis in pregnancy
by: Jennifer Kacmar, et al.
Published: (2001) -
The effect of erythromycin and clarithromycin versus azithromycin on serum valproate concentration
by: Muradi Albanji, et al.
Published: (2022) -
From Erythromycin to Azithromycin and New Potential Ribosome-Binding Antimicrobials
by: Dubravko Jelić, et al.
Published: (2016)