Comparing comorbidity measures for predicting mortality and hospitalization in three population-based cohorts
<p>Abstract</p> <p>Background</p> <p>Multiple comorbidity measures have been developed for risk-adjustment in studies using administrative data, but it is unclear which measure is optimal for specific outcomes and if the measures are equally valid in different populatio...
Saved in:
Main Authors: | Lix Lisa M (Author), Quail Jacqueline M (Author), Osman Beliz (Author), Teare Gary F (Author) |
---|---|
Format: | Book |
Published: |
BMC,
2011-06-01T00:00:00Z.
|
Subjects: | |
Online Access: | Connect to this object online. |
Tags: |
Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
|
Similar Items
-
Performance of Three Measures of Comorbidity in Predicting Critical COVID-19: A Retrospective Analysis of 4607 Hospitalized Patients
by: Monterde D, et al.
Published: (2021) -
Comparison of different comorbidity measures for use with administrative data in predicting short- and long-term mortality
by: Ng Yee-Yung, et al.
Published: (2010) -
Rural-urban differences in use of health services before and after dementia diagnosis: a retrospective cohort study
by: Julie Kosteniuk, et al.
Published: (2024) -
Osteoporosis-related fracture case definitions for population-based administrative data
by: Lix Lisa M, et al.
Published: (2012) -
Comparison of the performance of the CMS Hierarchical Condition Category (CMS-HCC) risk adjuster with the charlson and elixhauser comorbidity measures in predicting mortality
by: Li Pengxiang, et al.
Published: (2010)