Instructional design and facilitation approaches that promote critical thinking in asynchronous online discussions: A review of the literature

Asynchronous online discussions (AODs) are often used to promote critical thinking in online courses; however, recent research suggests that levels of critical thinking in discussions remain low. Furthermore, there is a lack of consensus in the literature about the definition of critical thinking an...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Laura A. Schindler (Author), Gary J. Burkholder (Author)
Format: Book
Published: Laureate Education Inc, 2014-12-01T00:00:00Z.
Subjects:
Online Access:Connect to this object online.
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!

MARC

LEADER 00000 am a22000003u 4500
001 doaj_3febfabce6984ff9b1583d5dea51b595
042 |a dc 
100 1 0 |a Laura A. Schindler  |e author 
700 1 0 |a Gary J. Burkholder  |e author 
245 0 0 |a Instructional design and facilitation approaches that promote critical thinking in asynchronous online discussions: A review of the literature 
260 |b Laureate Education Inc,   |c 2014-12-01T00:00:00Z. 
500 |a 10.18870/hlrc.v4i4.222 
500 |a 2157-6254 
520 |a Asynchronous online discussions (AODs) are often used to promote critical thinking in online courses; however, recent research suggests that levels of critical thinking in discussions remain low. Furthermore, there is a lack of consensus in the literature about the definition of critical thinking and many of the existing studies focus on one specific cognitive construct. Therefore, it is unknown which instructional approaches have the strongest empirical support for promoting critical thinking across multiple cognitive constructs. The purpose of this article is to present a review of the literature related to instructional design and facilitation approaches that promote critical thinking in AODs across multiple cognitive constructs (cognitive domain, cognitive presence, knowledge construction, and perspective-taking). Design approaches, such as providing scaffolding and using a debate-based instructional approach, and facilitation approaches, such as using Socratic questioning and allowing students to lead discussions, are effective for promoting critical thinking. Additional research should be conducted to confirm the efficacy of case-based, problem-based, project-based, and role play instructional approaches and to reach a consensus on the definition of critical thinking as well as how critical thinking should be demonstrated and accurately assessed in AODs. DOI: 10.18870/hlrc.v4i4.222 
546 |a EN 
546 |a ES 
690 |a Online discussions 
690 |a critical thinking 
690 |a cognitive presence 
690 |a knowledge construction 
690 |a perspective taking 
690 |a Education 
690 |a L 
690 |a Special aspects of education 
690 |a LC8-6691 
690 |a Theory and practice of education 
690 |a LB5-3640 
655 7 |a article  |2 local 
786 0 |n Higher Learning Research Communications, Vol 4, Iss 4 (2014) 
787 0 |n http://hlrcjournal.com/index.php/HLRC/article/view/222 
787 0 |n https://doaj.org/toc/2157-6254 
856 4 1 |u https://doaj.org/article/3febfabce6984ff9b1583d5dea51b595  |z Connect to this object online.