Reliability and validity of Chinese version of Cataldo Lung Cancer Stigma Scale

Purpose: To translate and apply the Cataldo Lung Cancer Stigma Scale (CLCSS) for Chinese populations and test the reliability and validity of the modified scale. Method: A total of 150 lung cancer patients were recruited from three tertiary hospitals in Shandong province and were tested using the Ch...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Qian-Qian Yang (Author), Hua-Xia Liu (Author), Chun-Ling Yang (Author), Shu-Yu Ji (Author), Lei Li (Author)
Format: Book
Published: Elsevier, 2014-03-01T00:00:00Z.
Subjects:
Online Access:Connect to this object online.
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!

MARC

LEADER 00000 am a22000003u 4500
001 doaj_45d20350629d4a8b94e6df1b7c062c2f
042 |a dc 
100 1 0 |a Qian-Qian Yang  |e author 
700 1 0 |a Hua-Xia Liu  |e author 
700 1 0 |a Chun-Ling Yang  |e author 
700 1 0 |a Shu-Yu Ji  |e author 
700 1 0 |a Lei Li  |e author 
245 0 0 |a Reliability and validity of Chinese version of Cataldo Lung Cancer Stigma Scale 
260 |b Elsevier,   |c 2014-03-01T00:00:00Z. 
500 |a 2352-0132 
500 |a 10.1016/j.ijnss.2014.02.011 
520 |a Purpose: To translate and apply the Cataldo Lung Cancer Stigma Scale (CLCSS) for Chinese populations and test the reliability and validity of the modified scale. Method: A total of 150 lung cancer patients were recruited from three tertiary hospitals in Shandong province and were tested using the Chinese version of CLCSS to assess its reliability and validity. Result: The Cronbach's α coefficient of the Chinese version of CLCSS and the four subscales ranged from 0.599 to 0.884, and the test-retest reliability ranged from 0.601 to 0.881. The content validity index of the scale was 0.875. Four factors were extracted by exploratory factor analysis that explained 58.6% of the total variance. Conclusion: The Chinese version of CLCSS is a reliable and valid measure of stigma among Chinese patients with lung cancer. 
546 |a EN 
690 |a Lung cancer 
690 |a Reliability 
690 |a Stigma 
690 |a Validity 
690 |a Nursing 
690 |a RT1-120 
655 7 |a article  |2 local 
786 0 |n International Journal of Nursing Sciences, Vol 1, Iss 1, Pp 23-27 (2014) 
787 0 |n http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2352013214000131 
787 0 |n https://doaj.org/toc/2352-0132 
856 4 1 |u https://doaj.org/article/45d20350629d4a8b94e6df1b7c062c2f  |z Connect to this object online.