Cover Image

Maternal and perinatal outcomes in women with and without hypertensive syndromes submitted to induction of labor with misoprostol

Objectives: To determine maternal and perinatal outcomes according to the mode of delivery in normotensive and hypertensive women bearing a live, full-term fetus, who were submitted to labor induction with misoprostol. Methods: Retrospective cohort study. The endpoints were tachysystole, uterine hyp...

Full description

Saved in:

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors:	Rossana Mariana Carvalho de Paiva Marques (Author), Alex Sandro Rolland Souza (Author), Francisco Edson de Lucena Feitosa (Author), Aurélio Antônio Ribeiro da Costa (Author), Melania Maria Ramos Amorim (Author)
Format:	Book
Published:	Taylor & Francis Group, 2017-01-01T00:00:00Z.
Subjects:	article
Online Access:	Connect to this object online.
Tags:	Add Tag No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!

Similar Items

Misoprostol sublingual versus vaginal para indução do parto Sublingual versus vaginal misoprostol for induction of labor
by: Francisco Edson de Lucena Feitosa
Published: (2006)

Misoprostol sublingual versus vaginal para indução do parto Sublingual versus vaginal misoprostol for induction of labor
by: Francisco Edson de Lucena Feitosa
Published: (2006)

Solução oral escalonada de misoprostol para indução do parto: estudo piloto Titrated oral solution of misoprostol for labour induction: a pilot study
by: Alex Sandro Rolland Souza, et al.
Published: (2010)

Can the Induction of Labor with Misoprostol Increase Maternal Blood Loss?
by: Paulo César Praciano Souza, et al.
Published: (2017)

Misoprostol administered sublingually at a dose of 12.5 μg versus vaginally at a dose of 25 μg for the induction of full-term labor: a randomized controlled trial protocol
by: Daniele Sofia Moraes Barros Gattás, et al.
Published: (2018)

Misoprostol em solução oral titulada escalonada versus via vaginal para indução do trabalho de parto: ensaio clínico randomizado Titrated oral suspension compared with vaginal misoprostol for labor induction: a randomized controlled trial
by: Alex Sandro Rolland Souza
Published: (2011)

Baixa dose de misoprostol sublingual (12,5 µg) para indução do parto Low dose of sublingual misoprostol (12.5 µg) for labor induction
by: Daniele Sofia de Moraes Barros Gattás, et al.
Published: (2012)

Uso de misoprostol retal para indução do parto em gestantes com amniorrexe prematura: ensaio clínico fase II Use of rectal misoprostol for induction of labor in patients with premature rupture of membranes: a phase II clinical trial
by: Francisco Carlos Nogueira Arcanjo, et al.
Published: (2003)

The effect of propranolol plus misoprostol with misoprostol alone on induction of labor
by: Atieh Mohammadzadeh Vatanchi, et al.
Published: (2021)

Avaliação da perda sanguínea em gestantes submetidas à indução do parto com misoprostol Evaluation the blood loss in pregnancies with misoprostol induced labor
by: Paulo César Praciano de Sousa, et al.
Published: (2010)

Pilot Study of Labor Induction with Titrated oral Misoprostol
by: Shi-Yann Cheng, et al.
Published: (2006)

Indução do Parto com Misoprostol: Comparação entre duas Doses Labor Induction with Misoprostol: Comparison of Two Dose Regimens
by: Dimas Augusto Carvalho de Araújo, et al.
Published: (1999)

Misoprostol for term labor induction: A randomized controlled trial
by: Gulshan A. Saeed, et al.
Published: (2011)

Labor induction with randomized comparison of cervical, oral and intravaginal misoprostol
by: Masoumeh Dadashaliha, et al.
Published: (2021)

Induction of Labor: A Comparative Study of Intravaginal Misoprostol and Dinoprostone
by: Aqueela Ayaz
Published: (2010)

Pharmacokinetics of vaginal versus buccal misoprostol for labor induction at term
by: Yana Vorontsova, et al.
Published: (2022)

Baixas doses de misoprostol vaginal (12,5 versus 25 mcg) para indução do parto a termo Low-dose vaginal misoprostol (12.5 versus 25 µg) for induction of labor at term
by: Francisco Airton Rangel Filho, et al.
Published: (2007)

Induction of Labor using Misoprostol in a Tertiary Hospital in the Southeast of Brazil
by: Tácito Augusto Godoy Silva, et al.
Published: (2017)

Survey of Provider Preferences Regarding the Route of Misoprostol for Induction of Labor at Term
by: Rachel Towns, et al.
Published: (2017)

Factors Associated with Intrapartum Cesarean Section in Women Submitted to Labor Induction
by: Glaucia Regina Pfützenreuter, et al.

Métodos para indução do parto Methods for labor induction
by: Olímpio Barbosa de Moraes Filho, et al.
Published: (2005)

Effect of delayed misoprostol dosing interval for induction of labor: a retrospective study
by: Elizabeth H. Harman Crowell, et al.
Published: (2019)

Pre-induction of labor with misoprostol. A useful option in antepartum cervical ripening
by: Yoan Hernández Cabrera, et al.
Published: (2017)

TO COMPARE THE EFFECTS OF ORAL MISOPROSTOL ALONE AND IN COMBINATION WITH INTRACERVICAL FOLEY'S IN INDUCTION OF LABOR
by: Dania Junaid, et al.
Published: (2019)

Misoprostol administered sublingually at a dose of 12.5 μg versus vaginally at a dose of 25 μg for the induction of full-term labor: a randomized controlled trial
by: Daniele S. M. B. Gattás, et al.
Published: (2020)

A comparison of misoprostol vaginal insert and misoprostol vaginal tablets for induction of labor in nulliparous women: a retrospective cohort study
by: Kjersti Engen Marsdal, et al.
Published: (2018)

Effect of misoprostol with and without evening primrose (Oenothera biennis) on induction of missed abortion
by: Mozhgan Mahmoodinasab, et al.
Published: (2023)

Misoprostol sublingual versus vaginal para indução do parto a termo Sublingual versus vaginal misoprostol for labor induction of term pregnancies
by: Olímpio Barbosa de Moraes Filho, et al.
Published: (2005)

A novel misoprostol delivery system for induction of labor: clinical utility and patient considerations
by: Stephenson ML, et al.
Published: (2015)

Fatores associados ao parto vaginal em gestantes de alto risco submetidas à indução do parto com misoprostol
by: Zuleika Studart Sampaio, et al.
Published: (2004)

Eficácia de dinoprostone e misoprostol para indução do trabalho de parto em nulíparas Efficacy of dinoprostone and misoprostol for labor induction in nulliparous women
by: Tenilson Amaral Oliveira, et al.
Published: (2011)

A critical appraisal of the misoprostol removable, controlled-release vaginal delivery system of labor induction
by: Patte C, et al.
Published: (2015)

A pilot study to compare propranolol and misoprostol versus misoprostol and placebo for induction of labor in primigravidae; a randomized, single-blinded, placebo-controlled trial
by: Ahmed Sherif Abdel Hamid, et al.
Published: (2023)

Comparing the effects of vaginal misoprostol, laminaria, and extra amniotic saline infusion on cervical ripening and induction of labor
by: Zohreh Tabasi, et al.
Published: (2020)

Effect of extra-amniotic Foley's catheter and vaginal misoprostol versus vaginal misoprostol alone on cervical ripening and induction of labor in Kenya, a randomized controlled trial
by: Alfred Osoti, et al.
Published: (2018)

Estudo comparativo entre misoprostol e placebo para o amadurecimento cervical e indução do parto A randomized trial of misoprostol and placebo for cervical ripening and induction of labor
by: Renata Murad Macedo, et al.
Published: (1998)

Misoprostol vaginal insert versus misoprostol vaginal tablets for the induction of labour: a cohort study
by: Daniele Bolla, et al.
Published: (2018)

Sublingual misoprostol versus dinoprostone gel in labour induction
by: Juveria Jahangir, et al.
Published: (2020)

Foley Catheter versus Vaginal Misoprostol for Labour Induction
by: Nasreen Noor, et al.
Published: (2015)

Labor induction with combined low-dose oral misoprostol and Foley catheter vs oral misoprostol alone at term gestation-a randomized studyAJOG Global Reports at a Glance
by: Anjali DNB, et al.
Published: (2022)