Evaluation of biocompatibility and bioactive potential of Well-Root PT by comparison with ProRoot MTA and Biodentine
Background/purpose: Well-Root PT is a novel bioceramic material developed to overcome limitations of conventional calcium silicate cements. The purpose of this study was to assess the biocompatibility and bioactivity of a premixed putty-type cement, Well-Root PT. Materials and methods: Identical cyl...
Saved in:
Main Authors: | , , |
---|---|
Format: | Book |
Published: |
Elsevier,
2024-10-01T00:00:00Z.
|
Subjects: | |
Online Access: | Connect to this object online. |
Tags: |
Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
|
MARC
LEADER | 00000 am a22000003u 4500 | ||
---|---|---|---|
001 | doaj_4ad02f85f8d84e6f83414a7fc8fa4e2f | ||
042 | |a dc | ||
100 | 1 | 0 | |a Yong Kwon Chae |e author |
700 | 1 | 0 | |a Ju Ri Ye |e author |
700 | 1 | 0 | |a Ok Hyung Nam |e author |
245 | 0 | 0 | |a Evaluation of biocompatibility and bioactive potential of Well-Root PT by comparison with ProRoot MTA and Biodentine |
260 | |b Elsevier, |c 2024-10-01T00:00:00Z. | ||
500 | |a 1991-7902 | ||
500 | |a 10.1016/j.jds.2024.03.004 | ||
520 | |a Background/purpose: Well-Root PT is a novel bioceramic material developed to overcome limitations of conventional calcium silicate cements. The purpose of this study was to assess the biocompatibility and bioactivity of a premixed putty-type cement, Well-Root PT. Materials and methods: Identical cylindrical samples were prepared from ProRoot MTA, Biodentine, and Well-Root PT. In vitro calcium weight volume and calcium ion release from the materials were evaluated with scanning electron microscopy and energy-dispersive spectroscopy and inductively coupled plasma-optical emission spectroscopy. An in vivo rat direct pulp capping model was implemented with the materials (n = 14 per material). The rats were sacrificed at 7 or 28 days. Hematoxylin and eosin and immunohistochemical analyses were performed. Results: In vitro calcium weight volume was 42.83 ± 8.82 % in ProRoot MTA, 47.05 ± 8.83 % in Biodentine, and 29.99 ± 4.94 % in Well-Root PT. Calcium ion releases from Well-Root PT after 7 and 28 days were similar with those from ProRoot MTA, but lower than those from Biodentine (P = 0.001 after 7 and 28 days equally). In an in vivo rat model, hematoxylin and eosin analysis showed no significant differences in inflammatory infiltration (P = 0.393) and hard tissue formation scores among the materials (P = 0.905). Also, both CD68 and DSPP expression showed similar results, with no significant differences among the materials (equally P = 0.874 for both markers). Conclusion: Within the limits of this study, Well-Root PT was comparable to ProRoot MTA and Biodentine in terms of biocompatibility and bioactivity. | ||
546 | |a EN | ||
690 | |a Bioactivity | ||
690 | |a Biocompatibility | ||
690 | |a Premixed putty-type bioceramics | ||
690 | |a Vital pulp therapy | ||
690 | |a Dentistry | ||
690 | |a RK1-715 | ||
655 | 7 | |a article |2 local | |
786 | 0 | |n Journal of Dental Sciences, Vol 19, Iss 4, Pp 2218-2225 (2024) | |
787 | 0 | |n http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1991790224000692 | |
787 | 0 | |n https://doaj.org/toc/1991-7902 | |
856 | 4 | 1 | |u https://doaj.org/article/4ad02f85f8d84e6f83414a7fc8fa4e2f |z Connect to this object online. |