Evaluation of biocompatibility and bioactive potential of Well-Root PT by comparison with ProRoot MTA and Biodentine

Background/purpose: Well-Root PT is a novel bioceramic material developed to overcome limitations of conventional calcium silicate cements. The purpose of this study was to assess the biocompatibility and bioactivity of a premixed putty-type cement, Well-Root PT. Materials and methods: Identical cyl...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Yong Kwon Chae (Author), Ju Ri Ye (Author), Ok Hyung Nam (Author)
Format: Book
Published: Elsevier, 2024-10-01T00:00:00Z.
Subjects:
Online Access:Connect to this object online.
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!

MARC

LEADER 00000 am a22000003u 4500
001 doaj_4ad02f85f8d84e6f83414a7fc8fa4e2f
042 |a dc 
100 1 0 |a Yong Kwon Chae  |e author 
700 1 0 |a Ju Ri Ye  |e author 
700 1 0 |a Ok Hyung Nam  |e author 
245 0 0 |a Evaluation of biocompatibility and bioactive potential of Well-Root PT by comparison with ProRoot MTA and Biodentine 
260 |b Elsevier,   |c 2024-10-01T00:00:00Z. 
500 |a 1991-7902 
500 |a 10.1016/j.jds.2024.03.004 
520 |a Background/purpose: Well-Root PT is a novel bioceramic material developed to overcome limitations of conventional calcium silicate cements. The purpose of this study was to assess the biocompatibility and bioactivity of a premixed putty-type cement, Well-Root PT. Materials and methods: Identical cylindrical samples were prepared from ProRoot MTA, Biodentine, and Well-Root PT. In vitro calcium weight volume and calcium ion release from the materials were evaluated with scanning electron microscopy and energy-dispersive spectroscopy and inductively coupled plasma-optical emission spectroscopy. An in vivo rat direct pulp capping model was implemented with the materials (n = 14 per material). The rats were sacrificed at 7 or 28 days. Hematoxylin and eosin and immunohistochemical analyses were performed. Results: In vitro calcium weight volume was 42.83 ± 8.82 % in ProRoot MTA, 47.05 ± 8.83 % in Biodentine, and 29.99 ± 4.94 % in Well-Root PT. Calcium ion releases from Well-Root PT after 7 and 28 days were similar with those from ProRoot MTA, but lower than those from Biodentine (P = 0.001 after 7 and 28 days equally). In an in vivo rat model, hematoxylin and eosin analysis showed no significant differences in inflammatory infiltration (P = 0.393) and hard tissue formation scores among the materials (P = 0.905). Also, both CD68 and DSPP expression showed similar results, with no significant differences among the materials (equally P = 0.874 for both markers). Conclusion: Within the limits of this study, Well-Root PT was comparable to ProRoot MTA and Biodentine in terms of biocompatibility and bioactivity. 
546 |a EN 
690 |a Bioactivity 
690 |a Biocompatibility 
690 |a Premixed putty-type bioceramics 
690 |a Vital pulp therapy 
690 |a Dentistry 
690 |a RK1-715 
655 7 |a article  |2 local 
786 0 |n Journal of Dental Sciences, Vol 19, Iss 4, Pp 2218-2225 (2024) 
787 0 |n http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1991790224000692 
787 0 |n https://doaj.org/toc/1991-7902 
856 4 1 |u https://doaj.org/article/4ad02f85f8d84e6f83414a7fc8fa4e2f  |z Connect to this object online.