Dipeptidyl peptidase-4 inhibitor treatment induces a greater increase in plasma levels of bioactive GIP than GLP-1 in non-diabetic subjects

• Main Authors: Tsuyoshi Yanagimachi (Author), Yukihiro Fujita (Author), Yasutaka Takeda (Author), Jun Honjo (Author), Hidemitsu Sakagami (Author), Hiroya Kitsunai (Author), Yumi Takiyama (Author), Atsuko Abiko (Author), Yuichi Makino (Author), Timothy J. Kieffer (Author), Masakazu Haneda (Author)
• Format: Book
• Published: Elsevier, 2017-02-01T00:00:00Z.
• Subjects: article
• Online Access: Connect to this object online.

Summary

Objective: Glucose-dependent insulinotropic polypeptide (GIP) and glucagon-like peptide-1 (GLP-1) possess multiple bioactive isoforms that are rendered non-insulinotropic by the enzyme dipeptidyl peptidase-4 (DPP-4). Recently, some ELISA kits have been developed to specifically measure "active" GIP and GLP-1, but it is unclear if these kits can accurately quantify all bioactive forms. Therefore, it remains uncertain to what extent treatment with a DPP-4 inhibitor boosts levels of biologically active GIP and GLP-1. Thus, we evaluated our novel receptor-mediated incretin bioassays in comparison to commercially available ELISA kits using plasma samples from healthy subjects before and after DPP-4 inhibitor administration. Methods: We utilized cell lines stably co-transfected with human GIP or GLP-1 receptors and a cAMP-inducible luciferase expression construct for the bioassays and commercially available ELISA kits. Assays were tested with synthetic GIP and GLP-1 receptor agonists and plasma samples collected from subjects during a 75 g oral glucose tolerance test (OGTT) performed before or following 3-day administration of a DPP-4 inhibitor. Results: A GIP isoform GIP(1-30)NH2 increased luciferase activity similarly to GIP(1-42) in the GIP bioassay but was not detectable by either a total or active GIP ELISA kit. During an OGTT, total GIP levels measured by ELISA rapidly increased from 0 min to 15 min, subsequently reaching a peak of 59.2 ± 8.3 pmol/l at 120 min. In contrast, active GIP levels measured by the bioassay peaked at 15 min (43.4 ± 6.4 pmol/l) and then progressively diminished at all subsequent time points. Strikingly, at 15 min, active GIP levels as determined by the bioassay reached levels approximately 20-fold higher after the DPP-4 inhibitor treatment, while total and active GIP levels determined by ELISA were increased just 1.5 and 2.1-fold, respectively. In the absence of DPP-4 inhibition, total GLP-1 levels measured by ELISA gradually increased up to 90 min, reaching 23.5 ± 2.4 pmol/l, and active GLP-1 levels determined by the bioassay did not show any apparent peak. Following administration of a DPP-4 inhibitor there was an observable peak of active GLP-1 levels as determined by the bioassay at 15 min after oral glucose load, reaching 11.0 ± 0.62 pmol/l, 1.4-fold greater than levels obtained without DPP-4 inhibitor treatment. In contrast, total GLP-1 levels determined by ELISA were decreased after DPP-4 inhibitor treatment. Conclusion: Our results using bioassays indicate that there is a greater increase in plasma levels of bioactive GIP than GLP-1 in subjects treated with DPP-4 inhibitors, which may be unappreciated using conventional ELISAs. Keywords: Receptor-mediated incretin bioassays, Glucose-dependent insulinotropic polypeptide, Glucagon-like peptide-1, Dipeptidyl peptidase-4

Item Description

2212-8778
10.1016/j.molmet.2016.12.009