Reasoning in the valuation of health‐related quality of life: A qualitative content analysis of deliberations in a pilot study
Abstract Background Group deliberation can be a pathway to understanding reasons behind judgement decisions. This pilot study implemented a deliberative process to elicit public values about health‐related quality of life. In this study, participants deliberated scales and weights for a German adapt...
Saved in:
Main Authors: | Fabia Gansen (Author), Julian Klinger (Author) |
---|---|
Format: | Book |
Published: |
Wiley,
2020-04-01T00:00:00Z.
|
Subjects: | |
Online Access: | Connect to this object online. |
Tags: |
Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
|
Similar Items
-
Knowledge Valuation by Iranian Women with High-Risk Pregnancy: A Qualitative Content Analysis
by: Zahra Shojaeian, et al.
Published: (2020) -
Health economic evaluations based on routine data in Germany: a systematic review
by: Fabia Mareike Gansen
Published: (2018) -
Virtual Interactive Case-Based Education (VICE): A Conference for Deliberate Practice of Diagnostic Reasoning
by: Alexander A. Logan, et al.
Published: (2021) -
The Use of Cumulative Disciplinary Score in an Integrated Curriculum to Prevent Deliberate Omission of Course Content
by: Sara Mortaz Hejri, et al.
Published: (2015) -
Rapid Cycle Deliberate Practice: Application to Adult Advanced Life Support
by: Erin Blanchard, et al.
Published: (2022)