A randomized control trial comparing buccal infiltration of 4% articaine with buccal and palatal infiltration of 2% lignocaine for the extraction of maxillary premolar teeth
Introduction: The use of articaine has been claimed to obviate the need for routine palatal local anesthetic injections on account of its better diffusion through soft and hard tissues as compared to other local anesthetic agents. Objective: The objective of the study is to evaluate the efficacy of...
Saved in:
Main Authors: | Vikas Sandilya (Author), Neelam Noel Andrade (Author), Paul C Mathai (Author), Neha Aggarwal (Author), Vyankatesh Sahu (Author), Shibani Nerurkar (Author) |
---|---|
Format: | Book |
Published: |
Wolters Kluwer Medknow Publications,
2019-01-01T00:00:00Z.
|
Subjects: | |
Online Access: | Connect to this object online. |
Tags: |
Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
|
Similar Items
-
Buccal versus buccal palatal infiltration for pulpal anesthesia using 2% lidocaine and 4% articaine: A randomized controlled trial
by: Umesh Kumar, et al.
Published: (2024) -
Comparative evaluation of buccal infiltration technique with buccal plus palatal infiltration technique using 4% articaine in patients with irreversible pulpitis of maxillary 1st molars: A prospective, randomized, In-Vivo study
by: Gufaran A Syed, et al.
Published: (2022) -
Anesthetic efficacy of 4% articaine and 2% lignocaine in achieving palatal anesthesia following a single buccal infiltration during periodontal therapy: A randomized double-blind split-mouth study
by: Balachandran Ashwath, et al.
Published: (2018) -
Anesthetic efficacy of articaine versus lignocaine as supplementary buccal infiltration after failed inferior alveolar nerve block - A systematic review of randomized clinical trials
by: Pradeeba Anandi Jeya Goutham, et al.
Published: (2023) -
Buffered 2% articaine in buccal infiltration of mandibular molars: a randomized triple-blind clinical trial
by: Sandro Alexander Lévano LOAYZA, et al.
Published: (2023)