Surface modification for bonding between amalgam and orthodontic brackets
Objective: Testing of methods to enhance the shear bond strength (SBS) between orthodontic metal brackets and amalgam by sandblasting and different primers. Materials And Methods: Three hundred samples of amalgam restorations (KerrAlloy®) were prepared in self-cured acrylic blocks, polished, and div...
Saved in:
Main Authors: | , , |
---|---|
Format: | Book |
Published: |
Wolters Kluwer Medknow Publications,
2017-01-01T00:00:00Z.
|
Subjects: | |
Online Access: | Connect to this object online. |
Tags: |
Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
|
MARC
LEADER | 00000 am a22000003u 4500 | ||
---|---|---|---|
001 | doaj_570bb8b16b3749b6b45a00c2554451d1 | ||
042 | |a dc | ||
100 | 1 | 0 | |a Wittawat Wongsamut |e author |
700 | 1 | 0 | |a Sirichom Satrawaha |e author |
700 | 1 | 0 | |a Kornchanok Wayakanon |e author |
245 | 0 | 0 | |a Surface modification for bonding between amalgam and orthodontic brackets |
260 | |b Wolters Kluwer Medknow Publications, |c 2017-01-01T00:00:00Z. | ||
500 | |a 2278-0203 | ||
500 | |a 10.4103/jos.JOS_25_17 | ||
520 | |a Objective: Testing of methods to enhance the shear bond strength (SBS) between orthodontic metal brackets and amalgam by sandblasting and different primers. Materials And Methods: Three hundred samples of amalgam restorations (KerrAlloy®) were prepared in self-cured acrylic blocks, polished, and divided into two groups: nonsandblasted and sandblasted. Each group was divided into five subgroups with different primers used in surface treatment methods, with a control group of bonded brackets on human mandibular incisors. Following the surface treatments, mandibular incisor brackets (Unitek®) were bonded on the amalgam with adhesive resin (Transbond XT®). The SBS of the samples was tested. The adhesive remnant index (ARI) and failure modes were then determined under a stereo-microscope. Two-way analysis of variance, Chi-square, and Kruskal-Wallis tests were performed to calculate the correlations between and among the SBS and ARI values, the failure modes, and surface roughness results. Results: There were statistically significant differences of SBS among the different adhesive primers and sandblasting methods (P < 0.05). The sandblasted amalgam with Assure Plus® showed the highest SBS (P < 0.001). Samples mainly showed an ARI score = 1 and mix-mode failure. There was a statistically significant difference of surface roughness between nonsandblasted amalgam and sandblasted amalgam (P < 0.05), but no significant differences among priming agents (P > 0.05). Conclusions: Using adhesive primers with sandblasting together effectively enhances the SBS between orthodontic metal brackets and amalgam. The two primers with the ingredient methacryloxydecyl dihydrogen phosphate (MDP) monomer, Alloy Primer® and Assure Plus®, were the most effective. Including sandblasting in the treatment is essential to achieve the bonding strength required. | ||
546 | |a EN | ||
690 | |a Amalgam | ||
690 | |a orthodontic brackets | ||
690 | |a primers | ||
690 | |a shear bond strength | ||
690 | |a surface roughness | ||
690 | |a Dentistry | ||
690 | |a RK1-715 | ||
655 | 7 | |a article |2 local | |
786 | 0 | |n Journal of Orthodontic Science, Vol 6, Iss 4, Pp 129-135 (2017) | |
787 | 0 | |n http://www.jorthodsci.org/article.asp?issn=2278-0203;year=2017;volume=6;issue=4;spage=129;epage=135;aulast=Wongsamut | |
787 | 0 | |n https://doaj.org/toc/2278-0203 | |
856 | 4 | 1 | |u https://doaj.org/article/570bb8b16b3749b6b45a00c2554451d1 |z Connect to this object online. |