Surface modification for bonding between amalgam and orthodontic brackets

Objective: Testing of methods to enhance the shear bond strength (SBS) between orthodontic metal brackets and amalgam by sandblasting and different primers. Materials And Methods: Three hundred samples of amalgam restorations (KerrAlloy®) were prepared in self-cured acrylic blocks, polished, and div...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Wittawat Wongsamut (Author), Sirichom Satrawaha (Author), Kornchanok Wayakanon (Author)
Format: Book
Published: Wolters Kluwer Medknow Publications, 2017-01-01T00:00:00Z.
Subjects:
Online Access:Connect to this object online.
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!

MARC

LEADER 00000 am a22000003u 4500
001 doaj_570bb8b16b3749b6b45a00c2554451d1
042 |a dc 
100 1 0 |a Wittawat Wongsamut  |e author 
700 1 0 |a Sirichom Satrawaha  |e author 
700 1 0 |a Kornchanok Wayakanon  |e author 
245 0 0 |a Surface modification for bonding between amalgam and orthodontic brackets 
260 |b Wolters Kluwer Medknow Publications,   |c 2017-01-01T00:00:00Z. 
500 |a 2278-0203 
500 |a 10.4103/jos.JOS_25_17 
520 |a Objective: Testing of methods to enhance the shear bond strength (SBS) between orthodontic metal brackets and amalgam by sandblasting and different primers. Materials And Methods: Three hundred samples of amalgam restorations (KerrAlloy®) were prepared in self-cured acrylic blocks, polished, and divided into two groups: nonsandblasted and sandblasted. Each group was divided into five subgroups with different primers used in surface treatment methods, with a control group of bonded brackets on human mandibular incisors. Following the surface treatments, mandibular incisor brackets (Unitek®) were bonded on the amalgam with adhesive resin (Transbond XT®). The SBS of the samples was tested. The adhesive remnant index (ARI) and failure modes were then determined under a stereo-microscope. Two-way analysis of variance, Chi-square, and Kruskal-Wallis tests were performed to calculate the correlations between and among the SBS and ARI values, the failure modes, and surface roughness results. Results: There were statistically significant differences of SBS among the different adhesive primers and sandblasting methods (P < 0.05). The sandblasted amalgam with Assure Plus® showed the highest SBS (P < 0.001). Samples mainly showed an ARI score = 1 and mix-mode failure. There was a statistically significant difference of surface roughness between nonsandblasted amalgam and sandblasted amalgam (P < 0.05), but no significant differences among priming agents (P > 0.05). Conclusions: Using adhesive primers with sandblasting together effectively enhances the SBS between orthodontic metal brackets and amalgam. The two primers with the ingredient methacryloxydecyl dihydrogen phosphate (MDP) monomer, Alloy Primer® and Assure Plus®, were the most effective. Including sandblasting in the treatment is essential to achieve the bonding strength required. 
546 |a EN 
690 |a Amalgam 
690 |a orthodontic brackets 
690 |a primers 
690 |a shear bond strength 
690 |a surface roughness 
690 |a Dentistry 
690 |a RK1-715 
655 7 |a article  |2 local 
786 0 |n Journal of Orthodontic Science, Vol 6, Iss 4, Pp 129-135 (2017) 
787 0 |n http://www.jorthodsci.org/article.asp?issn=2278-0203;year=2017;volume=6;issue=4;spage=129;epage=135;aulast=Wongsamut 
787 0 |n https://doaj.org/toc/2278-0203 
856 4 1 |u https://doaj.org/article/570bb8b16b3749b6b45a00c2554451d1  |z Connect to this object online.