Accuracy of photogrammetry, intraoral scanning, and conventional impression techniques for complete-arch implant rehabilitation: an in vitro comparative study
Abstract Background To compare the accuracy of photogrammetry, intraoral scanning and conventional impression techniques for complete-arch implant rehabilitation. Methods A master cast containing 6 implant abutment replicas was fabricated. Group PG: digital impressions were taken 10 times using a ph...
Saved in:
Main Authors: | Bowen Ma (Author), Xinxin Yue (Author), Yujie Sun (Author), Lingyan Peng (Author), Wei Geng (Author) |
---|---|
Format: | Book |
Published: |
BMC,
2021-12-01T00:00:00Z.
|
Subjects: | |
Online Access: | Connect to this object online. |
Tags: |
Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
|
Similar Items
-
Comparison of the accuracy of intraoral scans between complete-arch scan and quadrant scan
by: Youn-Gyeong Moon, et al.
Published: (2020) -
Comparison of the accuracy of intraoral scanning systems with conventional impression in dentate patient
by: İmadettin Alsayed, et al.
Published: (2020) -
Accuracy of Partial and Complete-Arch Conventional Versus Digital Impressions: An In-Vitro Study
by: Jeremy Chieng, et al.
Published: (2024) -
Evaluation of the accuracy of full-arch impressions between three different intraoral scanners and conventional impressions: A prospective in vivo study
by: Niharika Bhatia, et al.
Published: (2024) -
Accuracy of intraoral scanning methods for maxillary Kennedy class I arch
by: I-Ching Chang, et al.
Published: (2023)