Multiple-job holding is not a type of precarious employment
We are writing in regards to the review by Koranyi et al (1) on precarious employment and occupational accidents and injuries. In the review, multiple-job holding was classified as a type of precarious employment. In this letter, we argue multiple-job holding should not be considered a type of preca...
Saved in:
Main Authors: | Stef Bouwhuis (Author), Goedele A Geuskens (Author), Allard J van der Beek (Author), Cécile RL Boot (Author) |
---|---|
Format: | Book |
Published: |
Nordic Association of Occupational Safety and Health (NOROSH),
2019-01-01T00:00:00Z.
|
Subjects: | |
Online Access: | Connect to this object online. |
Tags: |
Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
|
Similar Items
-
Authors' response to "Multiple-job holding is not a type of precarious employment"
by: Isa Koranyi, et al.
Published: (2019) -
Experiences with multiple job holding: a qualitative study among Dutch older workers
by: S. Bouwhuis, et al.
Published: (2018) -
Predictors of working beyond retirement in older workers with and without a chronic disease - results from data linkage of Dutch questionnaire and registry data
by: Astrid de Wind, et al.
Published: (2018) -
Predicting working beyond retirement in the Netherlands: an interdisciplinary approach involving occupational epidemiology and economics
by: Micky Scharn, et al.
Published: (2017) -
Health, job characteristics, skills, and social and financial factors in relation to early retirement - results from a longitudinal study in the Netherlands
by: Astrid de Wind, et al.
Published: (2014)