The invisible schism: Teachers' and administrators' differing perceptions of education reforms

This study examined teachers' and administrators' perceptions of education reforms, focusing on a state legislated education bill that altered teacher evaluations. A mixed-method design, including an electronic survey, was used to gather perceptions of Colorado Senate Bill 10-191: Great Te...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Main Author: Sarah Melvoin Bridich (Author)
Format: Book
Published: Arizona State University, 2016-08-01T00:00:00Z.
Subjects:
Online Access:Connect to this object online.
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!

MARC

LEADER 00000 am a22000003u 4500
001 doaj_614aaf1677744a00b0abb1b51c1b10d4
042 |a dc 
100 1 0 |a Sarah Melvoin Bridich  |e author 
245 0 0 |a The invisible schism: Teachers' and administrators' differing perceptions of education reforms 
260 |b Arizona State University,   |c 2016-08-01T00:00:00Z. 
500 |a 1068-2341 
500 |a 10.14507/epaa.24.2192 
520 |a This study examined teachers' and administrators' perceptions of education reforms, focusing on a state legislated education bill that altered teacher evaluations. A mixed-method design, including an electronic survey, was used to gather perceptions of Colorado Senate Bill 10-191: Great Teachers and Leaders Act from teachers and administrators in the Rockies School District (RSD), as well as these two groups' general perceptions of teacher evaluations, education reforms, and change. Results revealed that teachers collectively hold similar views of education reforms, as do administrators; however, how each group perceives these elements of education policy and reform differs significantly. Both teachers and administrators believed that their groups see education reforms similarly, yet these groups had statistically significant differences on more than half of the survey questions. Qualitative data, in the form of open-ended responses to survey questions and semi-formal interviews, corroborated these findings. The two groups were unaware that their perceptions vary on critical issues related to the successful implementation of this education reform. This perception gap raises the questions of whether and how they can work together as reform implementation moves forward, and whether and how they can collectively support student learning as each group envisions, regardless of the policy itself. 
546 |a EN 
546 |a ES 
546 |a PT 
690 |a education reform 
690 |a education policy 
690 |a teacher perceptions 
690 |a teacher evaluations 
690 |a teacher effectiveness 
690 |a teacher quality 
690 |a administrator perceptions 
690 |a Education 
690 |a L 
655 7 |a article  |2 local 
786 0 |n Education Policy Analysis Archives, Vol 24, Iss 0 (2016) 
787 0 |n https://epaa.asu.edu/ojs/article/view/2192 
787 0 |n https://doaj.org/toc/1068-2341 
856 4 1 |u https://doaj.org/article/614aaf1677744a00b0abb1b51c1b10d4  |z Connect to this object online.