Alleviating Barriers Facing Students on the Boundaries of STEM Makerspaces

Makerspaces have become an increasingly prevalent supplement to K-16 STEM education, and especially so in undergraduate engineering programs. However, they also fall prey to hegemonic, marginalizing norms common in STEM spaces and, ultimately, the modern making movement has remained a white, male, m...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Madison E. Andrews (Author), Audrey Boklage (Author)
Format: Book
Published: MDPI AG, 2024-07-01T00:00:00Z.
Subjects:
Online Access:Connect to this object online.
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!

MARC

LEADER 00000 am a22000003u 4500
001 doaj_6ed9008969854c8cb47499fa4a01632b
042 |a dc 
100 1 0 |a Madison E. Andrews  |e author 
700 1 0 |a Audrey Boklage  |e author 
245 0 0 |a Alleviating Barriers Facing Students on the Boundaries of STEM Makerspaces 
260 |b MDPI AG,   |c 2024-07-01T00:00:00Z. 
500 |a 10.3390/educsci14070772 
500 |a 2227-7102 
520 |a Makerspaces have become an increasingly prevalent supplement to K-16 STEM education, and especially so in undergraduate engineering programs. However, they also fall prey to hegemonic, marginalizing norms common in STEM spaces and, ultimately, the modern making movement has remained a white, male, middle-class pursuit. Despite calls to broaden student participation in makerspaces due to the benefits of participation, there has been no examination of why some students choose not to visit these spaces. We surveyed (<i>n</i> = 151) and interviewed (<i>n</i> = 17) undergraduate STEM students to understand the barriers facing students before and during their initial participation. Using the lens of Social Boundary Spaces, we identified six barriers to successfully crossing the boundary into the makerspace, including: (1) not having enough time, (2) not feeling you have a purpose for visiting, and (3) not knowing how to obtain the proper certifications. Further, students find approaching makerspaces to be intimidating because of (4) the design of the space and (5) the perceived technical skillset of the students there. Notably, non-dominant students face a multitude of (6) barriers corresponding with their social identities. We conclude with recommendations relevant to educators, makerspace administrators, and engineering leadership for alleviating barriers and supporting students' involvement in STEM makerspaces. 
546 |a EN 
690 |a makerspace 
690 |a barriers 
690 |a inclusivity 
690 |a boundary spaces 
690 |a Education 
690 |a L 
655 7 |a article  |2 local 
786 0 |n Education Sciences, Vol 14, Iss 7, p 772 (2024) 
787 0 |n https://www.mdpi.com/2227-7102/14/7/772 
787 0 |n https://doaj.org/toc/2227-7102 
856 4 1 |u https://doaj.org/article/6ed9008969854c8cb47499fa4a01632b  |z Connect to this object online.