Comparative study of friction between metallic and conventional interactive self-ligating brackets in different alignment conditions
OBJECTIVE: The aim of this study was to compare the friction between three bracket models: conventional stainless steel (Ovation, Dentsply GAC), self-ligating ceramic (In-Ovation, Denstply GAC) and self-ligating stainless steel brackets (In-Ovation R, Dentsply GAC). METHODS: Five brackets were used...
Saved in:
Main Authors: | , , , , |
---|---|
Format: | Book |
Published: |
Dental Press Editora,
2014-06-01T00:00:00Z.
|
Subjects: | |
Online Access: | Connect to this object online. |
Tags: |
Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
|
MARC
LEADER | 00000 am a22000003u 4500 | ||
---|---|---|---|
001 | doaj_758cbca9d69b4b5e9f28e1f52fda6e4e | ||
042 | |a dc | ||
100 | 1 | 0 | |a Sérgio Ricardo Jakob |e author |
700 | 1 | 0 | |a Davison Matheus |e author |
700 | 1 | 0 | |a Maria Cristina Jimenez-Pellegrin |e author |
700 | 1 | 0 | |a Cecília Pedroso Turssi |e author |
700 | 1 | 0 | |a Flávia Lucisano Botelho do Amaral |e author |
245 | 0 | 0 | |a Comparative study of friction between metallic and conventional interactive self-ligating brackets in different alignment conditions |
260 | |b Dental Press Editora, |c 2014-06-01T00:00:00Z. | ||
500 | |a 2177-6709 | ||
500 | |a 10.1590/2176-9451.19.3.082-089.oar | ||
520 | |a OBJECTIVE: The aim of this study was to compare the friction between three bracket models: conventional stainless steel (Ovation, Dentsply GAC), self-ligating ceramic (In-Ovation, Denstply GAC) and self-ligating stainless steel brackets (In-Ovation R, Dentsply GAC). METHODS: Five brackets were used for each model. They were bonded to an aluminum prototype that allowed the simulation of four misalignment situations (n = 10). Three of these situations occurred at the initial phase (in which a 0.016-in nickel-titanium wire was used): 1. horizontal; 2. vertical; and 3. simultaneous horizontal/vertical. One of the situations occurred at the final treatment phase: 4. no misalignment (in which a 0.019 x 0.025-inch stainless steel rectangular wire was used). The wires slipped through the brackets and friction was measured by a Universal Testing Machine. RESULTS: Analysis of variance followed by Tukey's Test for multiple comparisons (α = 0.05) were applied to assess the results. Significant interaction (p < 0.01) among groups was found. For the tests that simulated initial alignment, Ovation(r) bracket produced the highest friction. The two self-ligating models resulted in lower and similar values, except for the horizontal situation, in which In-Ovation C(r) showed lower friction, which was similar to the In-Ovation R(r) metallic model. For the no misalignment situation, the same results were observed. CONCLUSION: The self-ligating system was superior to the conventional one due to producing less friction. With regard to the material used for manufacturing the brackets, the In-Ovation C(r) ceramic model showed less friction than the metallic ones. | ||
546 | |a EN | ||
546 | |a PT | ||
690 | |a Braquetes ortodônticos | ||
690 | |a Atrito | ||
690 | |a Estética | ||
690 | |a Dentistry | ||
690 | |a RK1-715 | ||
655 | 7 | |a article |2 local | |
786 | 0 | |n Dental Press Journal of Orthodontics, Vol 19, Iss 3, Pp 82-89 (2014) | |
787 | 0 | |n http://www.scielo.br/scielo.php?script=sci_arttext&pid=S2176-94512014000300082&lng=en&tlng=en | |
787 | 0 | |n https://doaj.org/toc/2177-6709 | |
856 | 4 | 1 | |u https://doaj.org/article/758cbca9d69b4b5e9f28e1f52fda6e4e |z Connect to this object online. |