Comparative study of friction between metallic and conventional interactive self-ligating brackets in different alignment conditions

OBJECTIVE: The aim of this study was to compare the friction between three bracket models: conventional stainless steel (Ovation, Dentsply GAC), self-ligating ceramic (In-Ovation, Denstply GAC) and self-ligating stainless steel brackets (In-Ovation R, Dentsply GAC). METHODS: Five brackets were used...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Sérgio Ricardo Jakob (Author), Davison Matheus (Author), Maria Cristina Jimenez-Pellegrin (Author), Cecília Pedroso Turssi (Author), Flávia Lucisano Botelho do Amaral (Author)
Format: Book
Published: Dental Press Editora, 2014-06-01T00:00:00Z.
Subjects:
Online Access:Connect to this object online.
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!

MARC

LEADER 00000 am a22000003u 4500
001 doaj_758cbca9d69b4b5e9f28e1f52fda6e4e
042 |a dc 
100 1 0 |a Sérgio Ricardo Jakob  |e author 
700 1 0 |a Davison Matheus  |e author 
700 1 0 |a Maria Cristina Jimenez-Pellegrin  |e author 
700 1 0 |a Cecília Pedroso Turssi  |e author 
700 1 0 |a Flávia Lucisano Botelho do Amaral  |e author 
245 0 0 |a Comparative study of friction between metallic and conventional interactive self-ligating brackets in different alignment conditions 
260 |b Dental Press Editora,   |c 2014-06-01T00:00:00Z. 
500 |a 2177-6709 
500 |a 10.1590/2176-9451.19.3.082-089.oar 
520 |a OBJECTIVE: The aim of this study was to compare the friction between three bracket models: conventional stainless steel (Ovation, Dentsply GAC), self-ligating ceramic (In-Ovation, Denstply GAC) and self-ligating stainless steel brackets (In-Ovation R, Dentsply GAC). METHODS: Five brackets were used for each model. They were bonded to an aluminum prototype that allowed the simulation of four misalignment situations (n = 10). Three of these situations occurred at the initial phase (in which a 0.016-in nickel-titanium wire was used): 1. horizontal; 2. vertical; and 3. simultaneous horizontal/vertical. One of the situations occurred at the final treatment phase: 4. no misalignment (in which a 0.019 x 0.025-inch stainless steel rectangular wire was used). The wires slipped through the brackets and friction was measured by a Universal Testing Machine. RESULTS: Analysis of variance followed by Tukey's Test for multiple comparisons (α = 0.05) were applied to assess the results. Significant interaction (p < 0.01) among groups was found. For the tests that simulated initial alignment, Ovation(r) bracket produced the highest friction. The two self-ligating models resulted in lower and similar values, except for the horizontal situation, in which In-Ovation C(r) showed lower friction, which was similar to the In-Ovation R(r) metallic model. For the no misalignment situation, the same results were observed. CONCLUSION: The self-ligating system was superior to the conventional one due to producing less friction. With regard to the material used for manufacturing the brackets, the In-Ovation C(r) ceramic model showed less friction than the metallic ones. 
546 |a EN 
546 |a PT 
690 |a Braquetes ortodônticos 
690 |a Atrito 
690 |a Estética 
690 |a Dentistry 
690 |a RK1-715 
655 7 |a article  |2 local 
786 0 |n Dental Press Journal of Orthodontics, Vol 19, Iss 3, Pp 82-89 (2014) 
787 0 |n http://www.scielo.br/scielo.php?script=sci_arttext&pid=S2176-94512014000300082&lng=en&tlng=en 
787 0 |n https://doaj.org/toc/2177-6709 
856 4 1 |u https://doaj.org/article/758cbca9d69b4b5e9f28e1f52fda6e4e  |z Connect to this object online.