Authors' awareness of concepts in the authorship of scientific publications: Viewpoints of the dental faculty in India

Background: There is a great deal of enthusiasm amongst the contemporary dental academicians and researchers to publish their research findings and interesting cases. The competitive atmosphere has fostered a 'publish or perish' sentiment following which authors sideline certain essential...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Silky Rajesh Punyani (Author), Ashwini Deshpande (Author)
Format: Book
Published: Elsevier, 2018-09-01T00:00:00Z.
Subjects:
Online Access:Connect to this object online.
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!

MARC

LEADER 00000 am a22000003u 4500
001 doaj_827b2fc05ae24b74a78fceb5b1dccd0c
042 |a dc 
100 1 0 |a Silky Rajesh Punyani  |e author 
700 1 0 |a Ashwini Deshpande  |e author 
245 0 0 |a Authors' awareness of concepts in the authorship of scientific publications: Viewpoints of the dental faculty in India 
260 |b Elsevier,   |c 2018-09-01T00:00:00Z. 
500 |a 2212-4268 
500 |a 10.1016/j.jobcr.2016.05.001 
520 |a Background: There is a great deal of enthusiasm amongst the contemporary dental academicians and researchers to publish their research findings and interesting cases. The competitive atmosphere has fostered a 'publish or perish' sentiment following which authors sideline certain essential and valid concepts in authorship and at times resort to unethical behavior knowingly or unknowingly to expand their publication list. Materials and method: We attempted to assess the current knowledge of the Indian dental teaching faculty regarding some important basic concepts in scientific authorship by means of a questionnaire-based pilot study. The respondents were asked questions pertaining to their knowledge of terms such as "authorship criteria", "conflict of interest", "plagiarism", and other authorship issues. Results: Our findings suggested significant lacunae regarding the authors' understanding of important basic concepts in scientific writing. Conclusion: We suggest possible measures to address this concern and also aim to survey a larger section of the academia in the future. 
546 |a EN 
690 |a Authorship 
690 |a Scientific publication 
690 |a Publication ethics 
690 |a Dentistry 
690 |a RK1-715 
655 7 |a article  |2 local 
786 0 |n Journal of Oral Biology and Craniofacial Research, Vol 8, Iss 3, Pp 151-153 (2018) 
787 0 |n http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2212426816300252 
787 0 |n https://doaj.org/toc/2212-4268 
856 4 1 |u https://doaj.org/article/827b2fc05ae24b74a78fceb5b1dccd0c  |z Connect to this object online.